Statement::executeQuery and Statement::execute should throw exception
-
Key: TUSCANY-1239
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1239
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type
Nao lembro se vc disse q ainda iria fazer ou eskeceu oq estah descrito no
jira [1], mas d qq forma criei um jira pra isso. Se fizer basta attachar o
patch lah ; )
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1239
Adriano Crestani
Sorry guys,
This email was not inteded to the ML I committed a mistake and typed the ML
address. Just ignore it!
Sorry again :(
Adriano Crestani
On 5/2/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nao lembro se vc disse q ainda iria fazer ou eskeceu oq estah descrito no
jira [1], mas d qq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493034
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171:
-
Here's an example command I used to copy repository artifacts to
On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments in
line...
On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a few questions and suggestions.
> - tuscany-sca.jar contains .svn directories, I guess they
I saw the following discussion in Monday's IRC chat log. (I couldn't
attend the chat because I was on a plane.)
[12:37] oh, so with the samples again, I guess we need Ant build scripts
[12:37] lresende, it does right now and i think thats good to do
[12:38] yes, +1 for the sample bins
[12:38
I'm inclined to agree that a blanket approach to this kind of testing is not
best. The more directed the tests are the better we can understand how
comprehensive the CTS is.
However, it's not clear to me whether we can now confirm the types are as
they should be through the metadata API alone, o
This looks like its caused by the move up to Axis2 1.2 which has in its pom
a dependeny on woodstox 3.2.1 where as Tuscany is using 3.2.0. I guess Maven
is getting confused as there's two versions and the one that ends up getting
used is environment dependent. I've added excludes for the 3.2.1 ve
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments
in
> line...
>
> On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a few questions and suggesti
On 5/1/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I built the sca\distribution and extracted the contents of
tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip (binary disb) and
tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip (src disb) found in the target
directory.
I then ran the RAT tool on the
It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the
readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1
so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still
gives space for more releases before the final 1.0.
...ant
On 5/1/07, Ber
Compilation warnings
Key: TUSCANY-1240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1240
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ SDO
Affects Versions: Cpp-current
Environment: PHP, L
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments
> in
> > line...
> >
> > On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL
On 5/2/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw the following discussion in Monday's IRC chat log. (I couldn't
attend the chat because I was on a plane.)
> [12:37] oh, so with the samples again, I guess we need Ant build
scripts
> [12:37] lresende, it does right now and i think thats
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for!
Comments
> > in
I added a few comments in-line.
Thanks,
Frank.
"kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/02/2007 06:38:28
AM:
> I'm inclined to agree that a blanket approach to this kind of testing is
not
> best. The more directed the tests are the better we can understand how
> comprehensive the CTS
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> On 5/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>> ant elder wrote:
>> >
>> > So now in the Axis2 binding the start method of the
>> > Axis2ModuleActivator it
>> > news up a whole lot of fac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493090
]
Douglas Siqueira Leite commented on TUSCANY-1239:
-
Okay. I will do this.
> Statement::executeQuery
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I saw the following discussion in Monday's IRC chat log. (I couldn't
> attend the chat because I was on a plane.)
>
> > [12:37] oh, so with the samples again, I guess we need Ant
build
> scrip
I'm trying to change tuscany-itest-databindings-sdo pom.xml to use
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT for the tuscany-sdo-plugin version as its been
changed to that from 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT but it keeps getting changed
back, i guess this is done by the way the tests a generated but I can't see
where the v
The ServletHostExtension currently uses methods like addServletMapping(int
host, String mapping, Servlet servlet) so in the things that use this like
the Axis2 binding you have to work out things like the host port, eg, see
the Axis2ServiceBinding start and stop methods. Could ServletHostExtension
I can build the sample OK using this ant script, but "ant run" doesn't work.
I'm using the pre-built distribution that Ant posted to
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/
The problem is with the very long Class-Path attribute in MANIFEST.MF
of tuscany-sca-manifest.jar. In Ant's pr
There's been a few past questions about what we're doing to support webapp's
in this release. I think the way the runtime is today webapp's should be
able to work just like the standalone J2SE samples and all we need to do is
make sure the all the tuscany dependency jars are included somewhere.
S
ant elder wrote:
The ServletHostExtension currently uses methods like
addServletMapping(int
host, String mapping, Servlet servlet) so in the things that use this
like
the Axis2 binding you have to work out things like the host port, eg, see
the Axis2ServiceBinding start and stop methods. Could
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> The ServletHostExtension currently uses methods like
> addServletMapping(int
> host, String mapping, Servlet servlet) so in the things that use this
> like
> the Axis2 binding you have to work out things like the hos
Hi,
I found a small bug in Input2InputTransformer.java (179)
"Object[] newArgs = new Object[source.length];
for (int i = 0; i < source.length; i++) {
Object child = mediator.mediate(source[i],
sourceType.getLogical().get(i), targetType.getLogical().get(i),
context.getMetadata());
Hi,
I believe that it is better to wait until having a more consistent version
of what already it is.
2007/5/2, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
- tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding
Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi.
We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the
RMI binding.
The tuscany-rmi module defines an RMI hosting extension point, similar
to how the tuscany-h
Hi,
I have updated the interfaces for extension developers and you can find them
at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/core-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core/.
Hopefully the javdoc is good enough for you to understand.
I also switched the CRUD implemen
Here is a concrete scenario ...
Two composites A, B in the SCA Domain
A has single component a
B has single component b
a provides a.service
b provides b.service
a_impl.service must delegate to b_impl.service
A provides no defined reference to b.service so a_impl will dynamically find
and inv
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding
>>
>>
>> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi.
>>
We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the
RMI binding.
The tuscany-rmi modul
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to change tuscany-itest-databindings-sdo pom.xml to use
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT for the tuscany-sdo-plugin version as its been
changed to that from 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT but it keeps getting changed
back, i guess this is done by the way
Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism
-
Key: TUSCANY-1241
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brian Murray updated TUSCANY-1241:
--
Attachment: cts.patch
Attaching the patch.
> Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new
Simon Laws wrote:
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding
>>
>>
>> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi.
>>
We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the
RMI binding.
Th
When bringing up the Tuscany core runtime with no usage of any
extensions, a Jetty server is always created. AIUI, this should
only happen when creating a service that has a Web services binding.
The code that creates the Jetty server is in the start method of
org.apache.tuscany.http.jetty.modul
I have opened Tuscany-1241 to provide the changes my team has made to the
CTS. As is mentioned in the Jira, the patch is not entirely complete in and
of itself and further may not reflect some of the changes that have gone in
recently. However, I'm aware that changes are being made to the CTS an
I have started looking into this yesterday, trying to make the das-service
web client working, but then decided to start simple as you are suggesting,
and started looking at a simple calculator web-app.
At the moment i have the sample web-app building Ok, with the necessary
dependencies on the wa
Hi All
I have put together a simple web application based on the calculator
sample we have. The client/jsp programming model is simple works same as in
a J2SE application. The generated war file for the calculator-web app has
all required dependencies on it, and should work on your app server o
Here is the complete list of dependencies loaded by the code in
tuscany-sca-all-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar when starting the
Tuscany core runtime.
(XML parsing)
stax-api-1.0.1.jar
wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar
(SCA APIs)
sca-api-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
(used by JettyRuntimeModuleActivator)
jetty-util
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/2/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I saw the following discussion in Monday's IRC chat log. (I couldn't
> > attend the chat because I was on a plane.)
> >
> > > [12:37] oh
On 5/2/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can build the sample OK using this ant script, but "ant run" doesn't
work.
I'm using the pre-built distribution that Ant posted to
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/
The problem is with the very long Class-Path attribute in M
Hi,
Thank you for reporting this. Actually, the problem is not in the
Input2InputTransformer. It's related to how we map a java interface to a
WSDL portType.
For a wrapper style (please see WS-JAX spec for the definition) WSDL
operation with the following input wrapper element, we don't supp
Ok I can work in this task, because I need this.
Currently I am making one sample where I would like to donate for the
project sca tuscany, the Luciano Resende is helping me very in this.
Thanks.
2007/5/2, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Thank you for reporting this. Actually, the prob
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding
>>
>>
>> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi.
>>
We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the
RMI binding.
The tuscany-rmi modul
+1 on 0.90
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the
readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1
so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still
gives space for
why does it matter if we call it beta1 or beta .90? It is a variation of
what we call beta. The fact that there is a number after Beta is an
indication that there might be revisions of Beta anyway before 1.0 release
is reached.
On 5/2/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on 0.9
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce Milestone 3
releases of Service Component Architecture (SCA) Native and Service
Data Objects (SDO) for C++.
The Tuscany SCA Native release:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Downloads
The Tuscany SDO C++ release:
http://cwi
Simon Laws wrote:
Simon, I have some strange things going on with my distribution build
which is affecting the way the manifests are build. Am investigating this
now but have to drop off the network til the morning.
Also, are you also building ant scripts also? I'm going to try and make a
few
I thought Ant's suggestion was just 0.90 and not beta anything. I can
live with this. I don't think we are ready yet to call it beta 1.0
or beta1 1.0.
Simon
haleh mahbod wrote:
why does it matter if we call it beta1 or beta .90? It is a variation of
what we call beta. The fact that there i
Comments inline.
Simon Nash wrote:
When bringing up the Tuscany core runtime with no usage of any
extensions, a Jetty server is always created. AIUI, this should
only happen when creating a service that has a Web services binding.
The creation of an instance of our JettyServer class should o
Hi Venkat, are the RMI samples working now (calculator-rmi-reference and
calculator-rmi-service)?
Just checking as they were not added into the samples pom, so they could be
built during regular builds.
On 4/28/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have added a couple of samples
Hi,
I have started working on Java SCA user guide [1] and Quick overview guide
for SCA[2].
I am assuming that Quick overview guide will be generic and can be used for
both native SCA and Java.
Please jump in and help if you are interested or provide comments/feedback.
We can use some good diagr
Simon Nash wrote:
Here is the complete list of dependencies loaded by the code in
tuscany-sca-all-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar when starting the
Tuscany core runtime.
(XML parsing)
stax-api-1.0.1.jar
wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar
(SCA APIs)
sca-api-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
(used by JettyRuntimeModuleAc
Hi,
We now get the java component and echo binding working with the extension
interfaces. Please see the calculator and echo-binding sample.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Interfac
Oops. sorry.. I did not add them to the samples pom when I committed them.
Yes they are working and I will add them right away. Thanks
- Venkat
On 5/3/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Venkat, are the RMI samples working now (calculator-rmi-reference and
calculator-rmi-service
56 matches
Mail list logo
