On 10/1/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1809.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Build Error - SCA topology XML model fails to resolve tuscany-core-spi
Simon,
Oh boy, I'm going to have to pick the bones out of this one...
This may take more than one email to deal with since I fear that things
could get quite lengthy.
First, how might the use of SOAP/JMS be represented in the SCA model?
There is no single right answer to this - certainly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1658.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Dynamically generated WSDL does not generate wsdl:output if method has void
Folks
ant elder wrote:
Cool. Is it really necessary to use policy intents when there's an existing
wsdl document, i.e. when binding.ws uses a wsdlElement pointing to a wsdl
binding? There's already ways of using soap/jms with wsdl so instead of:
binding.ws wsdlElement=
Folks,
Simon Laws wrote:
Oops, well spotted, it should have been as you suggest...
binding.ws requires=transport.jms/
It doesn't do any harm adding the WSDL but it works without although
currently I don't expect the WSDL definition model has the correct JMS
entries in it, i.e. I haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1630.
--
Resolution: Fixed
On fly wsdl generation with axis2 1.3, coding suggestion draft
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Interesting question here about which piece of configuration wins. I guess
that if you have gone to the trouble to specify the WSDL over and above
the
intent the WSDL should win.
I agree wsdl should win, that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531723
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1493:
-
Hi, Thanks for the code. Sorry to take a while to get back to
Hi,
I have gathered some comments about work going on in JIRA-1816, JIRA-1700
and the draft Tx Policy Spec below. Also tried to list some scenarios.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Transaction+Intents+and+Transaction+Manager+support
Please share your comments.
Regards,
Amita
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531727
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1493:
-
I've been going through the files in preparation for putting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531744
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1493:
-
I've added as much as I can to my sandbox in commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531763
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1815:
--
I tried the below test case which is very similar to what you
Hi,
Question in SDO -
ChangeSummary changeSummary = root.getDataGraph().getChangeSummary();
List changedDOs = commonj.sdo.ChangeSummary.getChangedDataObjects();
is changedDOs an ordered list with order based on time of the change (i.e.
if a user does a particular sequence of create, delete etc.
SDO Types based PK map needed in GraphMerger
Key: TUSCANY-1827
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1827
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-DAS-Next
DAS GraphMerger code has getPrimaryKeyName() based on SDO Type and
addPrimaryKey() based on database Column name.
So when these 2 are different GraphMerges fails to detect PKs. This is very
similar bug to JIRA-1807. Fixing in TUSCANY-1827
Regards,
Amita
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We
need
it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require the broker to be
started manually from the command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531777
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1816:
--
Hi, will you please share your thoughts in
On 10/2/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We
need
it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require
Comments inline ...
Kelvin.
On 02/10/2007, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Question in SDO -
ChangeSummary changeSummary = root.getDataGraph().getChangeSummary();
List changedDOs = commonj.sdo.ChangeSummary.getChangedDataObjects();
is changedDOs an ordered list with order
On 27/09/2007, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
that simplifies the development of service oriented applications and
provides a
On 10/2/07, Douglas Leite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the SCA developer guide I had some doubts about the
checkstyle
and pmd. I have installed those like plug-ins in the Eclipse IDE. However,
what I would like to know is if there is some specific configuration file,
which was
On 27/09/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
Paul
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that
the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531817
]
Nick Duncan commented on TUSCANY-1815:
--
When you say:
--
//create new customer using static
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531821
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1676:
I've noted this restriction on the dev guidelines page at
ant elder wrote:
How about splitting this into two separate samples one for jms and the other
for http? (I'll do this if no one has any objections)
...ant
+1 from me
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ant elder wrote:
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that
the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait
Hi,
I suggest that we host the design discussions at TUSCANYWIKI instead of
TUSCANY space as the later one is serving our web site and it's access is
constrained.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
[snip]
kelvin goodson wrote:
Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not
covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work,
and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered
by OpenCSA? Are they all covered by the based on
On 10/2/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I suggest that we host the design discussions at TUSCANYWIKI instead of
TUSCANY space as the later one is serving our web site and it's access is
constrained.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home
+1
Thanks,
Hi,
I spent more time reviewing the XQuery implementation type. I think it's a
great addition to our XML story. Let me share some of the questions and
suggestions I have so far.
1) The implementation.xquery model
The current code only supports: implementation.xquery
I think the SDO group is just a little behind in the process, there
was an e-mail to OASIS Members on 09/25/2007 with the subject
[members] Proposed Charter for OASIS Service Data Objects (SDO)
Technical Committee.
But others more involved with SDO can give more details.
On 10/2/07,
Hi,
I think Luciano has fixed similar issues under r579414 and r579426. Luciano,
does that apply to SCA as well?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:05 AM
Subject:
Luciano Resende wrote:
I think the SDO group is just a little behind in the process, there
was an e-mail to OASIS Members on 09/25/2007 with the subject
[members] Proposed Charter for OASIS Service Data Objects (SDO)
Technical Committee.
But others more involved with SDO can give more details.
I was able to fix for DAS and SDO. SCA build is very large and takes a
while, so it's still in progress...
On 10/2/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think Luciano has fixed similar issues under r579414 and r579426. Luciano,
does that apply to SCA as well?
Thanks,
Raymond
In playing around with recent DataBinding code I found it helpful to add the
following to
DefaultTransformerExtensionPoint.java, for each of the LazyPush/LazyPull
transformers
public String toString() {
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(super.toString());
PassByValueInteceptor should be spelled: PassByValueInterceptor
---
Key: TUSCANY-1828
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1828
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1828.
---
Resolution: Fixed
It's already fixed as part of the TUSCANY-1826
PassByValueInteceptor
Hi,
In most of our code, we don't override Object.toString(). As a result, we
can only see the system hash code if a given object is highlighted in the
debugger. Should we implement the toString() for the classes that represent
the configuration model (including SCA and Tuscany-specific
+1 from me.
Paul
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Release to vote Tuscany Java DAS beta2 has passed with 3 binding +1, 1
non-binding +1 and no -1s.
Luciano Resende,
Matthieu Riou,
Adriano Crestani,
Amita Vadhavkar (non-binding)
Folks,
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
kelvin goodson wrote:
Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not
covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work,
and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered
by OpenCSA?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531941
]
Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1814:
---
I applied the fix (along with the fix for TUSCANY-1821) and preliminary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531943
]
Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1814:
---
And regarding the IFX license, here is a link to IFX's license agreement:
Hi,
Good progress have been made on the user documentation. Thanks.
The following sections are empty and can use your help/expertise:
Implementations:
- Resource
- Spring
Bindings
- binding.rss
- binding.atom
Host Environments
Geronimo
I would be more than happy to write the sections if you
Hi,
TUSCANY-1814 contains a test case which includes IFX XSDs. The IFX license
can be found at http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license. Do you
see any legal issues to include the XSDs in our test case?
If it's a concern, then we can try to produce a dummy monster XSD for the
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
How about we put a check list up on the wiki so
we all get a view of what's going on and what needs to be done by when. I've
started one here by copying the checklist from the graduation guide (
I'd like to start using the implementation-data extension in the Store
sample, first to have the contents of the sample Catalog in a database,
then maybe extend it to the ShoppingCart as well.
In that context, I'm thinking about evolving the implementation-data
extension a little, along the
On 10/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
How about we put a check list up on the wiki so
we all get a view of what's going on and what needs to be done by when. I've
started one here by copying the checklist from the graduation guide (
The Getting started doc at
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-10-incubating-release-summary.data/getting-started-1.0.pdf
describing how to develop and run the Online store sample is not easy to
edit as it's a PDF.
How about opening it by converting it to a Wiki page? This way
Maven Clean from SVN repository failing
---
Key: TUSCANY-1829
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1829
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shane Blake updated TUSCANY-1829:
-
Description:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/;
mvn clean;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1829.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
TUSCANY-1676
Maven Clean from SVN repository failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531992
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-1829:
--
Please use maven 2.0.5. There is already an JIRA for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shane Blake reopened TUSCANY-1829:
--
The version of Maven made no difference, I am still getting the same error
Maven Clean from
55 matches
Mail list logo
