[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany DAS Implementation project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=14799projectId=36 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 18 Oct 2007 22:30:40 -0700 Finished at: Thu 18 Oct 2007 22:30:59 -0700 Total time: 19s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number:

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1858) Sample calculator-distributed README document outlines file structure that does not reflect what actually exists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-1858: --- Assignee: Simon Laws Sample calculator-distributed README document outlines file

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

Paul Fremantle wrote: I'll leave that thread going for a day or two more to see if there are any last comments, then we need to decide what to do. There's been a bit of spin and FUD around the diversity issue, we do more than meet the minimum requirements, but given the muddied waters how

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536234 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1860: -- I believe the ability to perform a callback in a separate

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread -- Key: TUSCANY-1860 URL:

Re: How about a Java SCA 1.0.1 release for October?

If we can figure out a reasonable list of incremental fixes, it will make sense to fo a quick 1.0.1 release. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 AM Subject: How about a

Re: I've fixed JIRA 1804

Simon Laws wrote: On 10/18/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed JIRA 1804 and as soon as i've the net again at home, i'm going to provide you the patch. I followed the Axis Async Test and added to HTTP_CACHED_CLIENT, a MultiThreadedConnectionManager and to SCANodeImpl a

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1804) @OneWay repeted invocations doesn't work in web service binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giorgio Zoppi updated TUSCANY-1804: --- Attachment: patch.diff This the patch which it needs to be reviewed. @OneWay repeted

Re: [DISCUSS] Tuscany SCA Roadmap and next releases

wang feng wrote: Hi all, We have used Tuscany 1.0 in our product and found some features is important to us. Thanks a lot for contributing here and helping us understand what you'd like to see in Tuscany! I have a few questions to make sure I understand what you're looking for. -

Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

Hi, I checked in some code as the seed to jump start the transaction policy support in Tuscany. Please see more details at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586640view=rev. By looking into the code we have today, I have a few questions. 1)

Shopping Store Tutorial, was: ApacheCon US 2007 - Shopping Store Overview

[snip] JS, Raymond, I have attached a picture depicting the components the Shopping Store Composite will have. I hope this represents the same picture you had in mind. Looks pretty good, I have a few suggestions below. Otherwise, please let me know. As you can see there, some questions

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1804) @OneWay repeted invocations doesn't work in web service binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giorgio Zoppi resolved TUSCANY-1804. Resolution: Incomplete I have a patch for resolving agaisnt revision 586626, but I

Re: ComponentType resolution issue on some plataform...

Luciano Resende wrote: Investigating the build issues we were having on the continuum environment (Ubuntu) I realized that the issue was that in Ubuntu, the composite files were always scanned before the componentTypes, then, when resolving the composites, the componentTypes being resolved

Re: ApacheCon US 2007 - Shopping Store Overview

Hi, Mario. Please see my comments below. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Antollini, Mario To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:59 AM Subject: RE: ApacheCon US 2007 - Shopping Store Overview Forgot to attach the slide J From: Antollini,

Re: handling exceptions and faults better with the Tuscany databinding framework

Hi, Scott. Sorry for the long delay. Your proposal sounds reasonable to me. Would you consider helping us by providing a patch? Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:20 AM

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1859. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied under r586540. Thank you for the contribution, Mark.

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536273 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1860: --- Hi, I checked in the itest under r586542. Thank you, Mark.

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1859: - Assignee: Raymond Feng Exception when using wires to wire Components

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1860: - Attachment: CallbackInSeparateThreadITest.patch The attached

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1855. -- Resolution: Fixed Simon Laws has applied this patch as part of SVN check in 581897

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

I'll leave that thread going for a day or two more to see if there are any last comments, then we need to decide what to do. There's been a bit of spin and FUD around the diversity issue, we do more than meet the minimum requirements, but given the muddied waters how about waiting a little

[SDO JAVA] JIRA priorities for the next release

I'm looking through the mounting number of JIRAs in SDO Java and hope to knock a few down. It would be good to get another release in plan. What do people want in it? I'm going to be doing a full pass through the open JIRAs in the near term and flag up my own priorities. Regards, Kelvin.

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-193) Fix eclipse warnings for sdo/tools

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-193. Resolution: Fixed cleaned up referenced files Fix eclipse warnings for sdo/tools

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536159 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1859: -- This problem is caused by the references not being built

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WireFix.patch Exception when using wires to wire Components

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WiresITest.patch WiresITest.patch creates a new wires iTest that wires two

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany DAS Implementation project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=14799projectId=36 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 18 Oct 2007 22:30:40 -0700 Finished at: Thu 18 Oct 2007 22:30:59 -0700 Total time: 19s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number:

Re: How about a Java SCA 1.0.1 release for October?

ant elder wrote: We've had a Java SCA release every month for a while now so to keep up that momentum I think it would be good to have an October release as well. It would probably take too much work to do that from the trunk for October, so how about a 1.0.1 release based on the 1.0 branch?

Re: How about a Java SCA 1.0.1 release for October?

ant elder wrote: We've had a Java SCA release every month for a while now so to keep up that momentum I think it would be good to have an October release as well. It would probably take too much work to do that from the trunk for October, so how about a 1.0.1 release based on the 1.0 branch?

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1128) Support attribute and element with same name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1128. - Resolution: Fixed Support attribute and element with same name

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1144) Type Schema Location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1144. - Resolution: Later Will await SDO 3 spec group resolution. Type Schema Location

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

Exception when using wires to wire Components - Key: TUSCANY-1859 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Assembly

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1846) Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-1846: Assignee: Luciano Resende Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1846) Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1846. -- Resolution: Fixed The problem was that Ubuntu was returning the list of files in a

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1858) Sample calculator-distributed README document outlines file structure that does not reflect what actually exists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-1858. - Resolution: Fixed Good spot Jason. Have removed the references from the README as these

ComponentType resolution issue on some plataform...

Investigating the build issues we were having on the continuum environment (Ubuntu) I realized that the issue was that in Ubuntu, the composite files were always scanned before the componentTypes, then, when resolving the composites, the componentTypes being resolved weren't properly initialized

How about a Java SCA 1.0.1 release for October?

We've had a Java SCA release every month for a while now so to keep up that momentum I think it would be good to have an October release as well. It would probably take too much work to do that from the trunk for October, so how about a 1.0.1 release based on the 1.0 branch? There's a bunch of

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1847) Component-type itest breaks the continuum build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1847. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Luciano Resende The problem was that Ubuntu was