[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gengshaoguang updated TUSCANY-1874:
---
Attachment: diff.txt
ConcurrentXAResourceTestCase.java
Thanks Raymond:
Another issue is that there are number of new jars in the lib folder that
weren't there in the 1.0 release. If they are now needed the LICENSE and
NOTICE files need to be updated but I think most of them probably aren't
needed so whats bringing them in needs to be tracked down and an exclude
The requirement was a bit hidden inside below mail thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg23299.html
Below is the JIRA issue for it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1698
checked so far that tomcat BasicDataSource.getConnection() does not support
passing in
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Is it intended for the new SCANode/Domain stuff to work without a
separate
Domain management node? I'm trying to get the Tuscany Geronimo code and
webapp distro working again and it always seems to require a
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Is it intended for the new SCANode/Domain stuff to work without a
separate
Domain management node? I'm trying to get the Tuscany Geronimo code
and
webapp
Hello,
Can the URI used to specify the location of a property file containing the
value of a property be relative, or should it always be absolute? If it can
be relative, what is it relative to?
I couldn't find anything in the SCA Assembly Model Spec which gave the
format of the URI. All I could
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I can add a create to the node factory which explicity omits domain
information to make this clearer.
public SCANode createSCANode(String nodeURI)
That would be nice.
...ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538718
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
I just came across this link
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites and
started the node) and then you add additional composites there doesn't seem
to be any way to start just those newly added composites. I can call
SCANode.start and that kind of works but it starts all the existing already
Hi,
I think the current assumption is that this file is a part of the
contribution that contains the composite in question. Hence it should be
reasonable to use the contribution classloader to resolve this including the
semantics that the import/export might bring in. Lets hear what others
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites and
started the node) and then you add additional composites there doesn't
seem
to be any way to start just those newly added composites. I can call
SCANode.start and that
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites
and
started the node) and then you add additional composites there doesn't
seem
to be any way to start just those
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites
and
started the node) and then you add additional composites
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added
composites
and
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538749
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-1879:
-
I looked at this failure to check if it had anything to do with
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've an
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-1879:
Assignee: Venkatakrishnan
Sample webapps fails with
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07,
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember in the past that adding remote bindings to services with
interfaces not marked as remotable used to cause and error or a warning.
This cropped up in the domain manager app which defines the following
component.
component name=DomainManagerComponent
Simon Laws wrote:
I seem to remember in the past that adding remote bindings to services with
interfaces not marked as remotable used to cause and error or a warning.
This cropped up in the domain manager app which defines the following
component.
component name=DomainManagerComponent
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I seem to remember in the past that adding remote bindings to services
with
interfaces not marked as remotable used to cause and error or a warning.
This cropped up in the domain manager app which defines the
Remote bidings attached to non-remotable services not reported as a warning in
some cases
-
Key: TUSCANY-1881
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1881
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Hi,
Here is the complete list of the jar differences:
The following are transivitely pulled in by rampart-core-1.3.jar. Venkat,
can you help here?
Only in tuscany-sca-1.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT\lib: addressing-1.3.mar
Only in tuscany-sca-1.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT\lib:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ant elder wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07,
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder
WSDL2Java doesn't generate code for a porttype not referenced by a service
--
Key: TUSCANY-1882
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1882
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Gavlin updated TUSCANY-1812:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
XMLHelper.load() IOException using schema that has both a
Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.
--
Key: TUSCANY-1883
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA EJB Binding Extension
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Gavlin updated TUSCANY-1812:
Attachment: tuscany-sdo.TUSCANY-1812_1830_1832.patch
This is a patch for issues TUSCANY-1812,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1883:
-
Attachment: binding-ejb_sample.patch
binding-ejb.patch
Tuscany EJB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Gavlin updated TUSCANY-1811:
Attachment: tuscany-sdo.TUSCANY-1811.patch
ClassCastException saving codegen-based DataGraph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende updated TUSCANY-1811:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
ClassCastException saving codegen-based DataGraph with
Allow the setting of the contribution root in the web.xml
-
Key: TUSCANY-1884
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1884
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunny Ip updated TUSCANY-1884:
--
Attachment: WebAppServletHost.java
Allow the setting of the contribution root in the web.xml
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of Tuscany SCA
for Java.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0.1-RC2/
Stage maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven/
RAT report:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gengshaoguang updated TUSCANY-1874:
---
Attachment: ConcurrentXAResourceTestCase.java
Hi Raymond,
You are right, I was wrong.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan resolved TUSCANY-1879.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in the branch.
Sample webapps fails with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1883:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539008
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1883:
---
The binding-ejb follows the tuscany-extension-helper approach. It's
45 matches
Mail list logo
