Sebastien,
We would like to enable a binary Tuscany distribution to run under OSGi. I
am not sure of the level of granularity at which a bundle-ized Tuscany makes
sense in terms of providing modularity and versioning using OSGi. But I
would like to make sure that the bundles from the list below
What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see more
consideration of release content before we crank the handle. It would
be great to see a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-1914.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
Hi,
With the recent 'classloader' changes the enhancements that I'd did in the
the calculator sample to demonstrate the use of implementation policies does
not seem to work anymore. Its primarily to do with the loading of
PolicyHandler class names from
shaoguang geng wrote:
Hi, Lucaino:
I tried more, and I noticed that to make JSONObject-pojo work, I need to
annote the service interface as @Remoteable.
The actual transform happens as:
JSONObject-JSON2XMLStreamReader-XMLStreamReader-XML2JavaBeanTransformer-pojo
So inside this chain, I
Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
a callback?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: slaws
Date: Tue Nov 20 06:35:45 2007
New Revision: 596692
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1787:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1795:
Move fix target to 1.1
helloworld-bpel sample fails with NoClassDefFoundError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1795:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Let me try that again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1801:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1880:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1790:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1800:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1796:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1797:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1786:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0.1)
Java-SCA-1.1
Move fix target to 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-1913.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
On Nov 20, 2007 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
a callback?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: slaws
Date: Tue Nov 20
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
a callback?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: slaws
Date:
Ok, I figured this out. There's been a change in the name of the services
file that used to contain the Policy hanlders.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Nov 20, 2007 9:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the recent 'classloader' changes the enhancements that I'd did in the
the
20 matches
Mail list logo