Amita,
I think Frank's note in this thread is key to the solution, in that the
line ...
return SDOUtil.createFromString(property.getType(), value);
will create a List if the type of the Property is set to
commonj.sdo{Strings}
Regards, Kelvin.
On 14/12/2007, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL
Thanks Rajini,
I propose we hold on until January in the hope that you will be able to
tackle this.
Many thanks, Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelvin,
I am busy until Christmas with the SCA-OSGi work, but I will try and look
at
the OSGi-enablement of SDO
Folks,
Let me put my oar in here.
I'll start first with SCA and ESBs and then move to discuss Tuscany.
Let's start with a controversial statement:
SCA is a programming model for ESBs
Daniel made some statements about what an ESB is - I do agree that this
is ill-defined (purposely so, from
Can't rerun mvn on wsdl2java unles clean done first
---
Key: TUSCANY-1936
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1936
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1936:
Summary: Can't rerun mvn on wsdl2java unless clean done first (was: Can't
rerun mvn on
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the SCA
assembly specification (lines 2319-2327) describes a binding name as being
unique within a reference or service. If a binding name is not specified in
the SCDL this is not the case currently. I.e the each binding adopts the
Simon,
One comment inline.
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the SCA
assembly specification (lines 2319-2327) describes a binding name as being
unique within a reference or service. If a binding name is not specified in
the SCDL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David T. Adcox updated TUSCANY-1935:
Attachment: (was: Test1935.java)
Conversion of Bytes to/from String properties is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David T. Adcox updated TUSCANY-1935:
Attachment: Test1935.java
This test better shows the fixes, the previous test case only
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
One comment inline.
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the
SCA
assembly specification (lines 2319-2327) describes a binding name as
being
unique
On Dec 17, 2007 12:14 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when building the latest trunk. Any
ideas?
Simon
[INFO]
-
---
[INFO] Building Apache Tuscany SCA Calculator Sample
On Dec 17, 2007 2:02 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
One comment inline.
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the
SCA
assembly
Dear root,
Please create an id for Mark Combellack on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid:mcombellack
Full name: Mark Combellack
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on
Duplicate binding name not flagged as error
---
Key: TUSCANY-1937
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1937
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Your CLA is on file now so i've sent off the userid request. That may take a
few days to get actioned and then you'll be emailed your userid and
password. Once you receive that if you've nothing ready to commit you could
test SVN access by something like creating yourself a sandbox directory
with:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12552466
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1937:
-
For example 2 a discussion is started [1] about how to generate default
See comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
One comment inline.
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the
SCA
assembly specification (lines
Hi
Some questions inline
Simon
On Dec 17, 2007 4:54 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
One comment inline.
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
doc-lit-wrapped WSDLs with wrapper elems with non-substitution-group refs are
incorrectly treated as non-wrapped
Key: TUSCANY-1938
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-1938:
Attachment: helloworld.wsdl
doc-lit-wrapped WSDLs with wrapper elems with
I have been thinking on ways to get BPEL more integrated in our sample
scenarios, particularly in our store scenario. I'd like to have the
ShoppingCart defined as a BPEL component, that would exercise some
more advanced BPEL features such as correlation, and state
persistence.
I'm going to start
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
A thought here is whether we should be keeping around all of the
original SCDL at all times.
I can regard the Domain as consisting of the SCDL made up from all the
contributions made into it. I have the view that the Domain is a
Comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
Some questions inline
Simon
On Dec 17, 2007 4:54 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
One comment inline.
On Dec 17, 2007 7:55 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been thinking on ways to get BPEL more integrated in our sample
scenarios, particularly in our store scenario. I'd like to have the
ShoppingCart defined as a BPEL component, that would exercise some
more advanced BPEL
I'm seeing the failure below when attempting to build
itest/exceptions-simple-ws from the latest trunk.
From the message and stack trace, it looks like the Exception2Exception
transformer that was previously using a POJO-JavaBean serializer has been
changed to use a JAXB serializer, and this is
body { margin: 0 0 0 0; padding:0 0 0 0 } td,div {
font-family:Tahoma;font-size:8pt;vertical-align:top } body { margin: 0 0 0 0;
padding:0 0 0 0 } .transcript { background-color:#d2d2d2; } .messageBlock {
margin-left:4px; margin-bottom:3px } .message { margin-left:100px;
Hi,
I just tried and it apparently works with IBM JDK and SUN JDK is not happy
with it. But anyway, we now use the JAXB to serialize POJO into XML and vice
versa. The POJOs have to follow JavaBean patterns as I described in the
e-mail when I checked in the changes.
Now the question is how
HI,
Thanks Lee.
My apologies. I missed this out as I had located it elsewhere outside of my
local codebase. I'll fix this right away.
- Venkat
On Dec 17, 2007 8:56 PM, lee zhenghui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just gave a try on this issue.. It is likely caused by missing jaas
Hi,
I've fixed this in r605107. I have added a section in the README as well
that should instruct on what is to be done to the java.security settings. I
have kept this to a minimum of having to make a line of change to the
java.security file.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Dec 18, 2007 10:41 AM, Venkata
29 matches
Mail list logo
