[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2262) Flow XSD schema validation errors through the monitor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2262: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam > Flow XSD schema validation errors through

Re: Protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated implementation

Appears like unannotated protected fields computed as properties also have the same problem. Java Common Annotations and APIs - v1.0 - Sec 1.8.13: 1349 Properties may also be injected via public setter methods even when the @Property annotation is not 1350 present. However, the @Property annotatio

Re: Adding SVN version to Java files

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From the above, we have 4 +1s and no -1s - although we have a > > > > preference not > > > > > > > to do this from ant. So, the consensus is to make this change. > > > > > > We haven't held a formal vote, so I

Re: Adding SVN version to Java files

I agree with Luciano's perspective. - Venkat On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Considering this has been there in several files for a while, and it > really does not affect anyone that does not want to use the extra one > line of information on the top

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2266) Problem with protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated implementation

Problem with protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated implementation -- Key: TUSCANY-2266 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2266 Pr

Re: Protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated implementation

Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2266 . ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Issue raised in OASIS SCA Java TC. See [1]. > > [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/email/archives/200804/msg00041.html >

Re: Protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated implementation

Issue raised in OASIS SCA Java TC. See [1]. [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/email/archives/200804/msg00041.html ++Vamsi On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PART-1: > The Java Annotations&APIs specification Lines 1407, 1408, 1

Policy dependency cleanup, was svn commit: r651130

I have merged the policy dependency cleanup work we did for SCA 1.2 to trunk under svn revision #651130. In Summary, these changes introduce couple new modules that is being used to break up ws specific dependencies from policy modules (e.g policy-xml-ws and policy-security-ws). Other then refacto

Re: [GSoC] Accepted Student Proposals for 2008 Announced

Hi all, first of all I'd like to thank you for your support and encouragement during GSoC student approval process (and for votes of course:))! I'll do my best to end this task with success. I'd like to wish more luck for those whose weren't accepted. Congratulations for students which are in - it

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

Oh, I also found a comment just before the declaration of the private variable phaseManager in InvocationChainImpl // FIXME: Not a good practice to use static reference Is it related? Regards Gilbert On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Gilbert Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The test created 4

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

The test created 4 threads. Two threads got a stateless scope service BService and called it. Another 2 threads got another stateless scope service CService. In Mike's case, 2 threads of BService worked fine, but other 2 threads of CService could not get the service because of the IllegalArgumentEx

Re: Using a subset of the databinding framework

I just realized that the databinding module is a bit messed up with the CallableReference related code that drags in the dependency on core. IMO, these should be refactored out. I'll try to fix that. BTW, the databinding-??? modules doesn't have dependency on core-spi. It is transitively pulle

Re: Using a subset of the databinding framework

Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Here is a list of modules related to databinding: 1) databinding: The SPIs and default implementations, also a list of XML parsing related databindings/transformers 2) databinding-*: Individual databindings such as SDO and JAXB 3) core-databinding: org.apache.tuscan

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2264) Updates to RequestContext's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2264. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next > Updates to RequestContext's vtest >

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2263) Updates to Exception's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2263. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next > Updates to Exception's vtest >

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2264) Updates to RequestContext's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2264: --- Assignee: Kevin Williams > Updates to RequestContext's vtest >

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2263) Updates to Exception's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2263: --- Assignee: Kevin Williams > Updates to Exception's vtest > -

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

Kevin Williams wrote: I reported an intermittent failure like this a few days ago. Are you seeing this consistently? -- Kevin Kevin, Consistently enough for me to have to remove the vtests from my builds in order to make some progress Yours, Mike.

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1997) Axis binding does not allow external configuration to increase the number of the maximum connections opened.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591682#action_12591682 ] Catalin Boloaja commented on TUSCANY-1997: -- Somehow it seems that the new static

Re: Adding SVN version to Java files

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Combellack wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 15 April 2008 02:59 > > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Adding SVN version to

Re: [CONF] Apache Tuscany: Build your first Web Services with Tuscany (page edited)

Yes, it's on my todo list for the next couple days... Do you have any ideas for what type of extensions to use ? Maybe JSON-RPC and use a quick web2.0 client app to consume the service ? On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:39 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This looks really good, do you have pl

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2265) Component stopped via ComponentManager can still be accessed

Component stopped via ComponentManager can still be accessed Key: TUSCANY-2265 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2265 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Co

Re: SVN version keyword expansion

My understanding is that expanded keywords are not considered in svn diff, commit, etc, and it's more like a local visual piece of information. >From [1], here is a little info on the subject. "Keywords and Spurious Differences The user-visible result of keyword substitution might lead you to th

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

Hi Mike, Would you do me a favor? Add a sleep as following code and retry. public void atScope1() throws Exception { ... CThread c2 = new CThread("ThreadC2"); // Please add following 2 lines. System.out.println("make a delay"); Thread.sleep(1000);

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2264) Updates to RequestContext's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yee-Kang Chang updated TUSCANY-2264: Attachment: RequestContextUpdatesJIRA2264.patch > Updates to RequestContext's vtest > ---

Re: Adding SVN version to Java files

Considering this has been there in several files for a while, and it really does not affect anyone that does not want to use the extra one line of information on the top of the java file. Why not let other that see some benefits on this to use it ? I'm still +1 on this. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2263) Updates to Exception's vtest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yee-Kang Chang updated TUSCANY-2263: Attachment: ExceptionUpdatesJIRA2263.patch > Updates to Exception's vtest > -

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2264) Updates to RequestContext's vtest

Updates to RequestContext's vtest - Key: TUSCANY-2264 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Test Components: Java SCA Verification Tests Rep

Re: Using a subset of the databinding framework

Hi, Here is a list of modules related to databinding: 1) databinding: The SPIs and default implementations, also a list of XML parsing related databindings/transformers 2) databinding-*: Individual databindings such as SDO and JAXB 3) core-databinding: org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databindin

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2263) Updates to Exception's vtest

Updates to Exception's vtest Key: TUSCANY-2263 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Test Components: Java SCA Verification Tests Reporter: Yee

Re: Authentication & Authorization across wsBinding & java Implementation - was : Using security policies in the Bigbank scenario

Anyway, I checked in the updated model and processors under http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=650652&view=rev. The processors can handle both syntax. Please see the ProcessorTestCase. Thanks, Raymond -- From: "Greg Dritschler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

It is not always happen. I suspect and curious that it is a timing issue. For the first test "atScope1", it created 4 threads. 2 of them were fine. See > ThreadB1->BService2 > ThreadB2->BService9 But, other 2 threads failed at setCurrentState. The code simply do: CService cServ

Re: Authentication & Authorization across wsBinding & java Implementation - was : Using security policies in the Bigbank scenario

I don't know whether the POLICY-26 proposal has been accepted. I think POLICY-26 is a bit clearer in conveying the meaning of the different choices than Venkat's proposal. While POLICY-26 fixes the schema so that conflicting authorization elements cannot be specified within a policy set, it does

Re: Vtests failing in latest builds?

I reported an intermittent failure like this a few days ago. Are you seeing this consistently? -- Kevin On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I'm getting a vtest failure in my latest builds - any explanation? > > --

Re: Adding SVN version to Java files

Mark Combellack wrote: -Original Message- From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 April 2008 02:59 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding SVN version to Java files Mark Combellack wrote: Hi, I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and notice

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2262) Flow XSD schema validation errors through the monitor

Flow XSD schema validation errors through the monitor - Key: TUSCANY-2262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2262 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: New Feature Componen

Re: SVN version keyword expansion

Mark Combellack wrote: Hi Simon, Have you recently changed your Subversion configuration file to enable SVN keyword expansion? The file in question is located: Windows %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Subversion\config Linux ~/.subversion/config The value in question is enable-auto-pr

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2261) Default monitor failure if bundle for local not found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2261: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam > Default monitor failure if bundle for loc

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2261) Default monitor failure if bundle for local not found

Default monitor failure if bundle for local not found - Key: TUSCANY-2261 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2261 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java

Re: [Discussion] Exception Handing when adding remote binding to services

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/18/08, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > TUSCANY 1881, tal

How to configure a remotable service, exposed with default binding?

Lets say we have a component A in composite C1, which needs a reference to a remotable service exposed with default binding (i.e., binding.sca) in component B under composite C2. In such scenario how should i configure the (binding) reference in composite C1? -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalin

Re: [Discussion] Exception Handing when adding remote binding to services

On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/18/08, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote >> > bindings >> > to services with in

Re: [CONF] Apache Tuscany: Build your first Web Services with Tuscany (page edited)

This looks really good, do you have plans to extend it further like with adding clients or other extension types? ...ant On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Page Edited : TUSCANY: > Build > your first Web Servic

Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Yang Lei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I agree with Sim

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2260) Validation Testcases Part -2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2260. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next Thanks for the patch Hasan. Committed at

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2260) Validation Testcases Part -2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2260: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Validation Testcases Part -2 > > >

RE: SVN version keyword expansion

Hi Simon, Have you recently changed your Subversion configuration file to enable SVN keyword expansion? The file in question is located: Windows %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Subversion\config Linux ~/.subversion/config The value in question is enable-auto-props. If this is set to ye

Re: SVN version keyword expansion

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On April 1, I checked out a file from SVN. Its version keywords > were not expanded in my local copy. Yesterday I checked out the > same file and the version keywords were expanded. This caused my > attempt to apply a pat

Re: SVN version keyword expansion

SVN stores the keywords along with the file and does not store the expanded keywords internally. So, when the file is viewed in svn, it will show "@version $Rev$ $Date$". It is the svn client that expands these keywords when the file is checked out. These keywords have been added to svn after yo

SVN version keyword expansion

On April 1, I checked out a file from SVN. Its version keywords were not expanded in my local copy. Yesterday I checked out the same file and the version keywords were expanded. This caused my attempt to apply a patch (derived from the previous checkout) to fail. The file when viewed in SVN co

Using a subset of the databinding framework

I'm writing sample admin tasks that need to work with our models (implementations, interfaces, policies) to inspect SCA artifacts, build them, wire them, package them etc. I don't want to have to drag the whole Tuscany runtime in these tasks or have to bootstrap the runtime layer (activator, r

Re: Registering ModuleActivators without specifying a META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.ModuleActivator file

Richard Mah wrote: Hi, Yes. I'm interested in only a subset of Tuscany and not the entire runtime. Thanks for the answer. The ModuleActivators I'm trying to use are WSDLInterfaceRuntimeModuleActivator, JavaInterfaceRuntimeModuleActivator, and JavaRuntimeModuleActivator. This leads to another

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2259) Multiplicity for heterogeneous bindings not working

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Mario Antollini (JIRA) < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> wrote: > Multiplicity for heterogeneous bindings not working > --- > > Key: TUSCANY-2259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: Some questions for workspace module in Tuscany

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: ... I can do the following: - Provide a few pre-canned init methods that bootstrap the subset of a Tuscany runtime required for your scenarios. I'll start with these: a) list deployables in a contribution b) resolve deployables given the set of avai