RE: Proposal for a (Java) community test suite for SDO

2006-12-01 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
Hi Dan, I was previously working with Kelvin Goodson to donate some junit tests on behalf of Rogue Wave Software. These tests are written purely to the SDO API and I have validated that the tests do run against Tuscany as well as Rogue Wave's implementation. Should I send the tests to Kelvin?

RE: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

2006-11-13 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
be great to get you into the mode of creating patches and I'm willing to help you get set up for that if you would like. It would be really good to aim for having some RogueWave committers! Best Reards, Kelvin. On 01/11/06, Andy Grove (Contractor) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just become

RE: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

2006-11-01 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
Hi Kelvin, I agree with your edits to the createTestObjectTypes() test in DataObjectListTest. This was clearly wrong. This has highlighted a general issue on some of our tests which we are now rectifying. We are also investigating issues around INSTANCE variables and I agree that we should at

RE: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

2006-11-01 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
.) It would be good to understand how you are currently working with this code in terms of source code control etc. and what your plans are as we move forward with this effort. Best Regards, Kelvin. On 01/11/06, Andy Grove (Contractor) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kelvin, I agree with your

RE: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
This makes sense to me too. We (RogueWave) would like to move away from char * and start using std::string in our implementation. Thanks, Andy. -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Winn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2006 11:00 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: