Congrats Vamsi !!!
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Vamsi... Welcome !!!
- Venkat
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
committer.
Hi,
This NullPointerException is occurring when i am using a wsdl
interface definition. It works when I use interface.java
component name=HelloWorldServiceComponent
service name=HelloWorldService
interface.java interface=helloworld.HelloWorldService /
!--
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should
integration whitepaper at OSOA and Sebastiens comments.
On 7/4/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) I develop SCA components, assemble them in a composite, package them
in an SCA contribution. I don't really know what a WAR or an EAR
Hi Raymond,
Comments Inline
On 7/4/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a subset of the distributed SCA domain composite
representing that component and enough
think that there are
contradictions here in the spec :(.
Regards
Manu
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Glad that you could join this discussion. Welcome :). We
need more participants like you to join this dicussion to come out
with the best approach. I have
McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:11 AM, Manu George wrote:
Some of the questions we have are:
1. Should we use this plugin approach and host the plugin
separatley
or intergrate Tuscany to be bundled as part of the Geronimo
distribution?
The plugin approach looks OK
more week, so I'll try to answer some of these
questions.
Manu George wrote:
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and proposed integrations
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules
Hi,
Really Sorry :) forgot to include geronimo-dev list in the cc after
saying it should be tracked on both the lists. Please respond to this
mail from now on as it has both the lists included.
Regards
Manu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May
on the Contribution Service, and Tuscany
M2 does not have this service available, that would explain why there is no
issues with M2.
On 5/10/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jay,
Cool, I have not yet tried the trunk of tuscany. I will try it out with
your fix
Regards
Manu
On 5
.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany sample app
Hi,
I am new to this list and product. I just wanted to know if
there is any work going on in implementing
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and proposed integrations
Understanding of the Current Integration
1) TuscanyContextListener creates an SCA domain
14 matches
Mail list logo
