[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

/TUSCANY-1909 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next I've run into a problem with two conversational Services. Consider the following scenario: AService

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542207 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1909: -- After some investigation, it appears that the problem is

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542206 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1909: -- I've created a simple addition to the conversations

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating (RC5)

Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of Tuscany > SCA for Java. ... > > Thanks, > Raymond > Hi Raymond, Tried out some more samples again with the binary distribution on Linux and did not find any issues. Get

Re: [VOTE] 3rd try: Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating (RC4)

Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of Tuscany > SCA for Java. > > The RC4 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC3. Thank you for > reporting and fixing the issues promptly. > > SVN Tag: > http://svn.apa

Re: [NOTICE] Mark Combellack voted as Tuscany committer

kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Welcome Mark! > > -- > Kelvin > > On 01/11/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Mark Combellack to become > > a Tuscany commit

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539161 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1883: -- Raymond, Thanks for applying the main patch. Converting the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1883: - Attachment: binding-ejb_sample.patch binding-ejb.patch > Tuscany

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Environment: SVN Revision 590426 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Attachments: binding-ejb.patch, binding-ejb_sample.patch It appears that the current ejb binding does not load

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1860: - Attachment: CallbackInSeparateThreadITest.patch The attached

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536234 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1860: -- I believe the ability to perform a callback in a separate

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

/browse/TUSCANY-1860 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN Head revision #586349 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next The

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1855. -- Resolution: Fixed Simon Laws has applied this patch as part of SVN check in 581897

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536159 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1859: -- This problem is caused by the references not being built

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

Model Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: Tuscany SVN Head 585955 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Attachments: WireFix.patch, WiresITest.patch The SCA specification allows components to be connected together using a wire

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WireFix.patch > Exception when using wires to wire Compone

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WiresITest.patch WiresITest.patch creates a new wires iTest that wires two

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1856) Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1856: - Attachment: ConversationIDExtensionPoint.patch The attached patch contains

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1856) Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base

URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1856 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN Revision 585955 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1855: - Attachment: DomainImplComparisonFix.patch > Possible incorrect comparison

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

Issue Type: Bug Environment: Tuscany SVN revision #585076 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Attachments: DomainImplComparisonFix.patch I think there is a possible comparison problem in the SCADomainImpl class

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1848: - Attachment: PropertyInjectionIntoArray_iTest.patch

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534572 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1848: -- When a multi-value property is found, the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN Head revision #584454 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Currently, Tuscany cannot inject multi value properties into methods/fields

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1336. -- Resolution: Fixed This issue has already been fixed by SVN check in #568331 See

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1839: - Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.0) Java-SCA-1.0 > Mi

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1839: - Attachment: AbstractPropertyJavaDocAndSpellingFixes.patch Patch to correct spelling

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Assembly Model Affects Versions: Java-SDO-1.0 Environment: SVN Revision #582742 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Trivial Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Attachments

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] > The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetProperty_EnableTest.patch

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533362 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1823: -- I've done some more investigation into this problem and

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1836) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1836: - Attachment: JMSQueueCreateModes_Tests.patch JMSQueueCreateModes.patch

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1836) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues

Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN Revision #582742 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Currently, the way that the JMS Binding

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1834) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when selecting the opeartion to invoke

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1834: - Attachment: JMSInvokeOperationTest.patch JMSInvokeOperation.patch The

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1834) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when selecting the opeartion to invoke

Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN Revision #579118 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Currently, the way that the JMS Binding

Re-introducing the Store interface into the Scoped Containers

A long while ago, Tuscany used to use the Store [1] interface in it's Conversational Scope container to persist data. However, this is no longer the case as Tuscany-1456 [2] updated the ConversationalScopeContainer to store the data in a ConcurrentHashMap. (See [3] for relevant changes) I would b

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

Issue Type: Bug > Components: Java SCA Core Runtime >Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 > Environment: SVN revision #579110 > Linux > Reporter: Mark Combellack >Priority: Minor > Fix

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyTest_FAILS.patch

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyComparisonFix.patch

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Environment: SVN revision #579110 Linux Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next As far as I can tell, it should be possible to get a property via: * Injection

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1819: - Attachment: RequestContextGetCallbackNPE.patch Patch for NullPointerException

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1819: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] A patch is now available for this issue

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0 Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next If you call the getCallback() method on the RequestContext for a Component that

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531047 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1819: -- The problem is in the RequestContextImpl class of the tuscany

Re: Resetting state of service references at conversation end

Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > As we agreed, the conversation id alone is not sufficient to deal with > conversations. We need to maintain the state of the conversations (STARTED, > ENDED or EXPIRED). > > I propose that we do the following: > > 1) Define a ConversationM

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1641: - Attachment: DestroyForCompositeScope.patch > @Destroy method not called

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1641: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] Have attached patch to fix this issue > @Destroy met

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

Implementation Extension Environment: Linux Tuscany SVN revision 571406 Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-1.0 If you define a method on a class with Composite Scope, the @Destroy method is not called when the SCA Domain is closed. The flow of events is

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Attachment: ServiceAnnotationUsingClassTestCaseUpdate.patch Attached a patch for the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] Marking as "patch available" > Tuscany doe

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Attachment: ServiceAnnotationUsingClass.patch The attached patch removes the check for

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523510 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1629: -- The problem is in the ServiceProcessor class in the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

Components: Java SCA Java Implementation Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.91 Environment: Linux Was using Tuscany SVN revision 570353 Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-0.91 The current implementation of Tuscany does not support using a

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1522) @ConversationID injection incorrectly assumes target type is a String

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518687 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1522: -- The problem is with the following code in the visitField

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1522) @ConversationID injection incorrectly assumes target type is a String

Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Java Implementation Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Environment: Was using Tuscany revision 563420 Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next Tuscany injection of @ConversationID assumes the target field is

Re: Unable to create new Jira Issues - get a null pointer

Mark Combellack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mike Edwards ...> writes: > > > > > Mark Combellack wrote: > > > Is anyone else having problems creating new Tuscany Jira bug reports? > > > > > > I am logged into Tuscany Jir

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516093 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1487: -- Looking through the code, the flow of events is: 1) My

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516094 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1487: -- I am not sure of the best solution to this problem. Possible

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-Next I have the scenario where I am attempting to deploy an application where: Runtime

Re: Unable to create new Jira Issues - get a null pointer

Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mark Combellack wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems creating new Tuscany Jira bug reports? > > > > I am logged into Tuscany Jira at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Tuscany > > > > I&#

Unable to create new Jira Issues - get a null pointer

Is anyone else having problems creating new Tuscany Jira bug reports? I am logged into Tuscany Jira at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Tuscany I've tried creating a new Tuscany issue of type bug and I get the following error: System Error A system error has occurred. If this problem per

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1467: - Attachment: EJB3Binding.patch The following patch should allow the EJB Binding to work

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1467: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] > EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 serv

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514192 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1467: -- The code in question is the binding.ejb project in the class

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

SCA EJB Binding Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Environment: Check out of Tuscany head Using JBoss 5 as EJB 3 Server Reporter: Mark Combellack Fix For: Java-SCA-Next The current EJB binding does not appear to work with EJB 3 servers such as JBoss

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1336: - Attachment: CallableReferenceObjectFactory.java > Tuscany does not support injectin

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1336: - Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-0.90 > Tuscany does not support injecting a Calla

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503385 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1336: -- First an appology, I am not using the latest version of

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Java Implementation Extension Reporter: Mark Combellack Tuscany does not appear to support injecting of CallableReferences with the @Callback annotation. According to page 11 (lines 682 and 683) of the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1321) The use of is not SCA 1.0 compliant. It is still using SCA 0.96 style

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500664 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1321: -- The problem appears to be in the assembly-xml module in

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1321) The use of is not SCA 1.0 compliant. It is still using SCA 0.96 style

Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Assembly Model Reporter: Mark Combellack Priority: Minor The SCA 1.0 specification says includes should be written as: (From page 47 of SCA 1.0 assembly specification) However, Tuscany still uses the 0.96 style includes

Conversational Scope: Accessing the max age and max idle on a RuntimeComponent

Hi, I have been updating my Conversational patch to reflect the changes introduced by the recent refactoring work. There have been lots of changes :-) I hope to submit the patch fairly soon. However, my Conversational Patch has run into a problem with the new refactored code. Previously, the

Questions about getting Conversational scope working

Hi, I've been attempting to get the Conversational Scope to work in Tuscany. I have had some success and managed to get some of the unit tests to work with Conversational Scope. Things that are currently working: * @Scope("CONVERSATION") * @ConversationID injection * I can invoke Conv

<    1   2