Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90, Java-SCA-0.91, Java-SCA-Next
Environment: svn revision 563847
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
The DefaultDataBindingExtensionPoint does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-1515:
---
Attachment: javabeans-exception-handler.diff
Patch to allow the JavaBeansDataBinding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-1452:
---
Attachment: (was: clone.diff)
InterfaceContract and its associated objects should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-1452:
---
Attachment: clone-2.diff
Patch to make InterfaceContract, Interface, and Operation
: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model, Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90, Java-SCA-0.91, Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Given the current infrastructure in 0.90, it is difficult for a binding
provider to setup a binding-specific databinding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-1452:
---
Attachment: clone.diff
Patch to make InterfaceContract, Interface, and Operation Cloneable
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505380
]
Matthew Sykes commented on TUSCANY-1344:
When the artifact processor is created, createSCABindings
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90, Java-SCA-0.91
Environment: sca-java-0.90
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Priority: Trivial
There doesn't appear to be a StAXArtifactProcessor capable of reading
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90, Java-SCA-0.91
Environment: sca-java-0.90
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Priority: Minor
While the 0.90 release was closing down, several changes were made to the
StAXArtifactProcessor implementations used
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1346
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model, Java SCA Core Runtime, Java SCA
Embedded Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90, Java-SCA-0.91
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
The resolution
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90
Environment: sca-java-0.90, IBM JDK5
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next, Java-SCA-0.90
During a discussion on the behavior of the implementation
binding (not even SCA
binding). And the component will be exposed as a json-rpc service. So
invoking the json-rpc reference handler is the correct behavior from the
client side.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe
have to. ;)
Thanks.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Matthew Sykes wrote:
I'm actually bumping up against one of the problems that ant has
described - the creation of $self$ reference URIs.
I don't believe a binding implementation should have to expect to deal
with odd URI's that were generated
PROTECTED]
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
installed the agent because a problem is expected. If
aspect weaving is used, I believe it should be an optional part of the
build environment and not force fit into the instrumentation agent
infrastructure.
Thanks.
--
Matthew Sykes
as it
currently stands. If so, is the spec going to change to require the
use of @OneWay for this purpose?
At the moment, both the simplecallback and the inner.composite
samples do not work properly.
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e
. In this
use case, the client wants a sync response. I think the use case
is going to be common, that's why it's in the spec.
Dave
--
Matthew Sykes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core
Affects Versions: Java-M2, Java-M3
Environment: Tuscany revision 495535
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Fix For: Java-M3
Tuscany assumes that the forward operation of a bi-directional interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-1052:
---
Description:
Tuscany assumes that the forward operation of a bi-directional interface
Jim,
I'm interested in the answer to this as well. I think we all understand
that non-blocking operations must have void return types. The question
really boils down to whether or not bidirectional services are
considered non-blocking.
I have a simple piece of code that uses a
is void and thus
returns a message with a null body, which is probably the cause of
your NPE.
Agreed. My point is that I don't think the
NonBlockingBridgingInterceptor should have been used in my example as
the client is expecting a synchronous result from FI.cf.
Thanks again.
--
Matthew Sykes
of the function to the Axis2
implementation and simply added a new emitter. Does it make sense to
introduce that dependency on the SDO side?
--
Matthew Sykes
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Looking at modularizing the tree, it seems to me that the tools and
java2wsdl/wsdl2java plugins don't actually have any
Tools
Affects Versions: Java-M2
Environment: Tuscany Java-M2 and current trunk
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
I've been playing with the BigBank sample and have added a fault to the
AccountService's withdraw operation. After changing the AccountService.wsdl
(attached
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-978?page=all ]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-978:
--
Attachment: AccountService.wsdl
WSDL in a more convenient form...
Tuscany WSDL2Java can't handle WSDL fault messages
)
at
org.apache.tuscany.tools.wsdl2java.generate.JavaInterfaceGenerator.generate(JavaInterfaceGenerator.java:174)
... 20 more
--
Matthew Sykes
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!--
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional
If Jervis hit the same issue I did, the problem was that the
2.2-SNAPSHOT is now dependent on
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:1.0-alpha-7-SNAPSHOT which wasn't
available in any of the configured repositories.
I ended up pulling it from snapshots.repository.codehaus.org to resolve
the
Jim,
I'd be interested in contributing to this but I'm not sure I know
exactly where to begin. If you're willing to spend a bit of time on the
QA necessary to describe the intended flow through the bindings, wires
invocation handlers, and policy handlers (using some of Jeremy's
presentation
FWIW, I think I've been running into a problem at build time because of
this exact issue. There's a bit of code in the javascript sample
HelloWorldTestCase.java test that gathers up all of the
META-INF/sca/default.scdl resources it can find. The test then throws
away the first resource in
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core
Environment: Win XP, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM Windows 32 build pwi32dev-20060511
(SR2)
Reporter: Matthew Sykes
Priority: Trivial
When attempting to run maven from various samples directories:
[INFO] [surefire:test
32 matches
Mail list logo