On Jul 21, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Hi Simon, On the left side of the window, under "Operations", there
is a
link "Edit this issue". If you don't see it, then it must be only
available to committers.
It may be available to folk in the "tuscany-developers" group which
inclu
Hi Simon, On the left side of the window, under "Operations", there is a
link "Edit this issue". If you don't see it, then it must be only
available to committers.
Frank.
"Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/21/2006 09:28:15 AM:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Thanks for that. How did you do it. I lo
Hi Frank,
Thanks for that. How did you do it. I looked at the JIRA and I could see how
you change the category like that? Is it a committer thing?
Regards
Simon
On 7/21/06, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon,
I reassigned TUSCANY-505 to the SCA component for further investigati
Simon,
I reassigned TUSCANY-505 to the SCA component for further investigation.
Frank.
"Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/21/2006 07:44:35 AM:
> I've got to that age where I've started replying to my own mails. Oh
dear.
>
> Looking back at the JIRAs raised when doing the interop tes
I've got to that age where I've started replying to my own mails. Oh dear.
Looking back at the JIRAs raised when doing the interop testing a couple of
weeks ago I may have missed a detail. When trying to get round JIRA505,
which describes the problem with having xsi:type in the wrapper element, I
Ok, I had some success over the last couple of days in getting C++ SCA to
talk to Java SCA. The executive summary is that we got a message from C++
client to C++ SCA service on to a Java SCA service and all the way back
again. Yippeee.
The scenario is based on the BigBank for C++ sample that Ed h
