Re: [C++] Tuscany exceptions vs SCA-C++ exceptions

2006-09-20 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: That's exactly what I intended when moving the SCARuntimeException to the CPP extension. I think we need a really good trawl of exception throwing handling so this is a great time to do it. I'll take a look at the core runtime and cpp extension. Cheers, On 20/09/06, Jean-S

Re: [C++] Tuscany exceptions vs SCA-C++ exceptions

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Borley
+1. I'll do the Python extension. On 9/20/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's exactly what I intended when moving the SCARuntimeException to the CPP extension. I think we need a really good trawl of exception throwing handling so this is a great time to do it. I'll take a look at

Re: [C++] Tuscany exceptions vs SCA-C++ exceptions

2006-09-20 Thread Pete Robbins
That's exactly what I intended when moving the SCARuntimeException to the CPP extension. I think we need a really good trawl of exception throwing handling so this is a great time to do it. I'll take a look at the core runtime and cpp extension. Cheers, On 20/09/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EM

[C++] Tuscany exceptions vs SCA-C++ exceptions

2006-09-20 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Hi, The SCA spec for C++ defines some SCA exceptions for use in an SCA C++ client or C++ component implementation. These exceptions are currently distributed with our CPP extension, but there are a number of places in our runtime code (core runtime and other extensions) where we currently sti