On 6/30/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having problems applying this. I will merge the changes in by hand
- please bear with me.
It's now applied.
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
On 6/8/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
Here's the patch with correct SVN property settings. Please try again.
Thanks,
Raymond
I'm having problems applying this. I will merge the changes in by hand
- please bear with me.
--
Jeremy
-
: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH] Porting SDO
DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox
Thanks Raymond - I'll work on applying this.
I think you've identified a key issue here - how does a databinding's
type system mapping work in the new recursive model?
ting SDO
DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox
Thanks Raymond - I'll work on applying this.
I think you've identified a key issue here - how does a databinding's
type system mapping work in the new recursive model?
In the 0.9 view, modules were flat so it was easy
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:07 AM
Subject: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH] Porting SDO
DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox
Thanks Raymond - I'll work on applying this.
I think you've
Thanks Raymond - I'll work on applying this.
I think you've identified a key issue here - how does a databinding's
type system mapping work in the new recursive model?
In the 0.9 view, modules were flat so it was easy to make the
association between a module and a TypeHelper. Recursion opens up n
Hi, Jeremy.
Attached is a patch for the SDO DataBinding code in
your sandbox. It ports the code to the new SPIs in the sandbox. Please review
and apply.
There're several TODOs in the code. We need to
understand how to get the corresponding SDO TypeHelper for a given
DeploymentContext.