[POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Before publishing artifacts to the snapshot repo I need to make sure all the versions contain incubator which means updating all the POMs. I would like to change this to the version of this next release and so would like input on what that should be: [ ] 1.0-M2-incubator [ ]

Re: [POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Raymond Feng
+1 on 1.0-M2-incubator. Raymond - Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: [POLL] Release name Before publishing artifacts to the snapshot repo I need to make sure all the versions

Re: [POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi Jeremy, '0.95-incubator'. I vaguely recollect reading some mail that mentioned that M* is necessary in incubator releases.. if this is true then... '0.95-M2-incubator' Thanks - Venkat On 9/8/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before publishing artifacts to the snapshot repo I

Re: [POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
One change: we should definitely be consistent with the other incubator projects on this. CXF, Yoko, and MyFaces have all gone with the format: #.#-incubator-M# or #.#-incubator-alpha-# (incubator before the build qualifier) Thus, the list should be: [ ] 1.0-incubator-M2 [ ]

Re: [POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 for for 1.0-incubator-M2 Is 095 related to SCA spec ? Then this is not going to match with SDO and DAS, right ? - Luciano On 9/8/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One change: we should definitely be consistent with the other incubator projects on this. CXF, Yoko, and MyFaces

Re: [POLL] Release name

2006-09-08 Thread Brent Daniel
+1 for 1.0-incubator-M2 Brent On 9/8/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for for 1.0-incubator-M2 Is 095 related to SCA spec ? Then this is not going to match with SDO and DAS, right ? - Luciano On 9/8/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One change: we should definitely