On Oct 7, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
We could start with your previous post, and maybe take a portion of
Monday's
IRC Chat to go over Q&A or clarifications ? Does that sound good ?
Happy to chat on Monday (but remember it's a holiday in some parts of
the world and people may
We could start with your previous post, and maybe take a portion of Monday's
IRC Chat to go over Q&A or clarifications ? Does that sound good ?
- Luciano
On 10/7/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to state up front there that I don't think you did any thing
wrong or inappropri
I want to state up front there that I don't think you did any thing
wrong or inappropriate. Far from it; I think you did exactly the
right thing.
During the vote you said you didn't have sufficient experience to
make criticism and could we schedule a walkthrough; others agreed
with them.
"Here Here" to Venkat's words of support, and FWIW, in the same spirit of
trusting those who have gone before, here's my +1.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 07/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
My abstinence is only due to me not possessing enough knowledge not only
of
what
Hi Jeremy,
My abstinence is only due to me not possessing enough knowledge not only of
what it is but more of what it should best be. While your explanation here
has really helped (thanks for that) to understand what this is about, I am
yet to reach a position where I can 'evaluate / review' it.
It was not my intention to force a rethink. All I asked for, at a time
when the vote was going slowly, was some assistance in understanding the
technical detail of the artifacts in order that I might further the voting
process. As I understood the procedure, the vote could be carried by n +1s
On Oct 6, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
This got PPMC +1's from jboynes, dkulp, jmarino, rineholt, rfeng,
bdaniel, kwilliams
and +1 from Luciano Resende
However, there are significant abstentions from antelder,
kelvingoodson and svkrish on the basis that the purpose of
releasin
This got PPMC +1's from jboynes, dkulp, jmarino, rineholt, rfeng,
bdaniel, kwilliams
and +1 from Luciano Resende
However, there are significant abstentions from antelder,
kelvingoodson and svkrish on the basis that the purpose of releasing
this is unclear.
In light of this confusion I thi
