Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-18 Thread ant elder
No problem Kelvin, I can take a look. ...ant On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:51 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when I took this > for > a vote on the general AT incubator list [1]. At the moment I'm not > finding > the time t

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-18 Thread kelvin goodson
Sorry, in my recent post I gave the wrong link for the general thread -- it should have been http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16971.html Kelvin. On 18/03/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when I took this >

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-18 Thread kelvin goodson
This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when I took this for a vote on the general AT incubator list [1]. At the moment I'm not finding the time to address these issues. Is there anyone who might be able to pick this up? It doesn't require SDO knowledge, just release management.

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-04 Thread Raymond Feng
I tried the RC2 and it looks good to me. +1. Thanks, Raymond -- From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 3:30 AM To: "tuscany-dev" Subject: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incuba

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-04 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Amita Vadhavkar wrote: I have tested the RC2 in details, and all seems fine, so here is my +1 Regards, Amita On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have done some basic testing on Linux, compiles fine from a clean maven repo and samples are working. I hav

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-04 Thread ant elder
+1, looks good to me. Any chance our mentors could have a look and cast a vote? ...ant On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:30 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany > SDO > for Java > > The distribution files are at [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-04 Thread Amita Vadhavkar
I have tested the RC2 in details, and all seems fine, so here is my +1 Regards, Amita On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have done some basic testing on Linux, compiles fine from a clean > maven repo and samples are working. I have also looked at licen

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-03 Thread Luciano Resende
I have done some basic testing on Linux, compiles fine from a clean maven repo and samples are working. I have also looked at license and notice files, seems fine. +1 On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks good to me. +1 > > Frank. > > [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-03-02 Thread Frank Budinsky
It looks good to me. +1 Frank. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/29/2008 06:30:37 AM: > Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany SDO > for Java > > The distribution files are at [1] > Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] > The tag for the re

[VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

2008-02-29 Thread kelvin goodson
Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany SDO for Java The distribution files are at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] The tag for the release is at [3] The rat report is at - [4], [5] Here's my +1 Kelvin. [1] http://people.apache.