Done under revision #639026
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. I feel it should be changed to something different
> from what it is on 1.2 branch ASAP.
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAI
Thanks for the pointer. I feel it should be changed to something different
from what it is on 1.2 branch ASAP.
++Vamsi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please see this thread.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28890.htm
Please see this thread.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28890.html
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that there is an sca-java-1.2 branch, should the version number on the
> trunk (i.e. java/sca) be bumped up to 1.
Now that there is an sca-java-1.2 branch, should the version number on the
trunk (i.e. java/sca) be bumped up to 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT?
++Vamsi
