Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in?
Simon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nash
Date: Sun Mar 16 10:59:45 2008
New Revision: 637621
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=637621view=rev
Log:
Fix for TUSCANY-2077
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in?
I do have his test running, but for some reason it never failed
for me, even when the printlns showed the incorrect conversation ID
was being used. So I just used the printlns to debug the problem
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in?
I do have his test running, but for some reason it never failed
for me, even when the printlns showed the incorrect
I have created a TUSCANY-2090 to add a testcase for this issue so that we
don't regress.
++Vamsi
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's
