Hi Luciano,
I followed JIRA-899 and the J2SE (my old client etc.) works fine.
But for the war, (even the one from your sandbox, without any changes), I am
getting the
below error. This error was not there on 20th Nov :), So not sure if this is
a result of
some other JIRA/compatibility issues? I
Hi Luciano,
I have made the web app and the das container combination working. There
were some class cast etc. problems in orginal code. Now the jsp is showcasing
a working SELECT through getAllCompanies(). This work is attached to
JIRA-904. Please check it. I can modify it to showcase all CRUD +
Just in case, by working with patches I mean to do something like :
svn diff /path/to/patchfile.patch
This would create a patchfile.patch with only the difference from your
code relative to the one on the trunk (on this case sandbox) and I can
easily just apply the patch in my end.
Let me
I have commited some small changes and a simple web app to my sandbox.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/lresende/
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 11/17/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim and Kevin, thanks... I'm working on
Jim Marino wrote:
If I understood your question correctly, DAS allows a 1:1 and 1:N
relationship,
An application could have multiple components using the same config
file,
or could split the config file based on the components model... but the
choice is really made by the app developer.
Jim and Kevin, thanks... I'm working on that...
On 11/17/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
If I understood your question correctly, DAS allows a 1:1 and 1:N
relationship,
An application could have multiple components using the same config
file,
or could split
If I understood your question correctly, DAS allows a 1:1 and 1:N
relationship,
An application could have multiple components using the same config
file,
or could split the config file based on the components model... but
the
choice is really made by the app developer.
This sounds similar
Hi Luciano,
I had done a few changes and will be attaching the working code to
JIRA in next couple of hours. Just wanted to update you for same and
will start looking at the
test case development after that.
(Please note, for the basic testing to check that the code is working,
I have still
kept
Hi Amita
Sorry for taking little longer, but here are some comments on your
updates:
I have incorporated your changes to DataAccessComponentTypeLoader
Changes to DataAccessEngine.java are assuming that the container should
be responsible to setup database, and I don't believe that is the
Hi,
I have tried my best to explain... just in case something is not right in
this could somebody pitch in please.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 11/14/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I have updated (Tuscany-904) with a new version of the DAS container.
This is based on the
On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I have tried my best to explain... just in case something is not
right in
this could somebody pitch in please.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 11/14/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I have updated (Tuscany-904) with a
On 11/14/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One minor thing here. Unless the configuration values are always
immutable, an ObjectFactory should be injected otherwise one
component could accidentally modify a configuration parameter of
another as instances will be shared. When the component
On Nov 14, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 11/14/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One minor thing here. Unless the configuration values are always
immutable, an ObjectFactory should be injected otherwise one
component could accidentally modify a configuration parameter of
I think this begs the question of what DAS configuration is. I'm
not sure all configuration is part of a component type since the
latter always has a 1:1 relationship with its implementation. For
example, I believe the DAS configuration specifies mappings to
database tables. Are these mappings
Hi All
I have updated (Tuscany-904) with a new version of the DAS container.
This is based on the initial contribution that Amita did, with some
clean-up, refactoring and additions to try to fix a possible problem with
mutable properties that are shared among instance (pointed by Jim
15 matches
Mail list logo
