I agree that data integration is needed in SCA and that DAS has an
important role to play in this. This close connection is the
reason why DAS (and SDO) are part of the Tuscany project. And
beacuse of this, we as the Tuscany project have the opportunity to
decide the optimal packaging of the
Thanks for restarting the discussion on this. I think DAS is in
a special position because it's part of our project and therefore
we have the opportunity to choose whether these DAS components are
packaged and released with Tuscany SCA or with Tuscany DAS.
For other SCA extensions, we as Tuscany
Data integration is something needed in SCA. The main idea around
Implementation.das [1] is to integrate DAS and SCA to allow exposing
services that interact with a persistent layer in a declarative
fashion hiding some of the implementation details from the service
developer. Some more info is
