Sorry .. its JIRA-365.
Srikanth
On 5/12/06, Srikanth Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Created the JIRA issue 317 and added the code and required jars.
Srikanth
On 5/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
> [snip]
> > Anyway the reason
Created the JIRA issue 317 and added the code and required jars.
Srikanth
On 5/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
[snip]
> Anyway the reason i started all this was to have a Ruby container for
SCA
> using JRuby which has a BSF implementation fo
Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
[snip]
Anyway the reason i started all this was to have a Ruby container for SCA
using JRuby which has a BSF implementation for Ruby. So i saw the new
Groovy
container that was created - so i just took the complete code, changed
all
the references of Groovy to Ruby,
Excellent!
Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
I know that i vanished after asking you for all the info. I got real busy
with my office work and never got a chance to try the steps you wrote
here.
Apologise for that.
Anyway the reason i started all this was to have a Ruby container for SCA
using JRu
I know that i vanished after asking you for all the info. I got real busy
with my office work and never got a chance to try the steps you wrote here.
Apologise for that.
Anyway the reason i started all this was to have a Ruby container for SCA
using JRuby which has a BSF implementation for Ruby.
Didnt get a chance to go through all the docs yet, as i was busy with some
other things. Will try to read through and send in comments tomorrow.
Srikanth
On 4/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A few pages up on the wiki, primarily:
> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Extending
>
A few pages up on the wiki, primarily:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Extending
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Extending/DeploymentProcess
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Extending/ConfigurationModel
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Extending/StAXLoading
Comments appreciated.
--
Jeremy
S
Yup. We can go with the Javascript implementation.
Srikanth
On 4/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > Sure, i can help with that. Will even use your steps to write a dummy
> > implementation so that i can get something concrete out of it. Do you
> ha
Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Sure, i can help with that. Will even use your steps to write a dummy
> implementation so that i can get something concrete out of it. Do you have
> any scenario in mind that we can use to write up this document. How about a
> simple scripting language with a few const
Sure, i can help with that. Will even use your steps to write a dummy
implementation so that i can get something concrete out of it. Do you have
any scenario in mind that we can use to write up this document. How about a
simple scripting language with a few constructs and see how we can develop
the
Srikanth Bhattiprolu wrote:
> How do i go about writing a new component type, i dont want anything fancy
> might be just all System.out statements to the console but i want to go
> through the flow as described in the programming model. I was trying to
> understand this using the Javascript impleme
How do i go about writing a new component type, i dont want anything fancy
might be just all System.out statements to the console but i want to go
through the flow as described in the programming model. I was trying to
understand this using the Javascript implementation but hadnt been able to
make
12 matches
Mail list logo