On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
>> What mike says. I should just add that picking the right process version
>> depending on what's already executing is handled by the runtime. The only
>> thing that it will need is to know what is
Matthieu Riou wrote:
What mike says. I should just add that picking the right process version
depending on what's already executing is handled by the runtime. The only
thing that it will need is to know what is the definition for all the
process versions that are still around (haven't been undepl
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>> So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
>> implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
>> handling all the versioning and matching a run
Luciano Resende wrote:
So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
handling all the versioning and matching a running process instance
with the right BPEL process version ?
Also, can the modules tha
So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
handling all the versioning and matching a running process instance
with the right BPEL process version ?
Also, can the modules that handle deploy.xml and p
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am interested in getting rid of the need to have a physical deploy.xml
> file in the directory with a BPEL process file.
>
> Can I supply the same information to the ODE runtime through some other
> means, suc
Folks,
I am interested in getting rid of the need to have a physical deploy.xml file in the directory with
a BPEL process file.
Can I supply the same information to the ODE runtime through some other means, such as method
parameters or some in-memory mechanism?
For the SCA integration, the
