Re: Fixing TUSCANY-1849 in the 1.0.1 release

2007-10-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Nash wrote: I just posted a proposal to tuscany-dev for fixing TUSCANY-1849 without breaking interoperability. If we do this, I think it would be better to defer this change until Tuscany SCA 1.1 as it would involve adding a new protocol versioning mechanism as well as fixing the actual

Re: Fixing TUSCANY-1849 in the 1.0.1 release

2007-10-22 Thread Simon Nash
See [1] for the OASIS thread, and [2] for the Tuscany thread that agreed on the incorrect use of wsa:To. The proposal to use wsa:To was a mistake on my part. I completely missed the statement in the WS-Addressing spec that wsa:To is a URI, unline wsa:From and wsa:EeplyTo which are endpoint

Re: Fixing TUSCANY-1849 in the 1.0.1 release

2007-10-21 Thread Simon Nash
I just posted a proposal to tuscany-dev for fixing TUSCANY-1849 without breaking interoperability. If we do this, I think it would be better to defer this change until Tuscany SCA 1.1 as it would involve adding a new protocol versioning mechanism as well as fixing the actual problem. I think

Fixing TUSCANY-1849 in the 1.0.1 release

2007-10-20 Thread Simon Nash
Since it appears we are going to have a 1.0.1 release, I'd like to propose fixing TUSCANY-1849 in this release. This would make 1.0.1 non-interoperable with 1.0, but 1.0.1 would be interoperable with 1.1 and future releases. The alternative is to defer this fix until 1.1, which would make 1.0.1