Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Simon Laws wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Laws wrote: Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... Simon On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Simon Laws wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Laws wrote: Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... Simon On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I apologize in

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > On Mon, Ma

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > > Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... > > > > Simon > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I apol

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Simon Laws wrote: Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... Simon On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had started with a long email in the first place :) no p

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line... Simon On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had > started with a long email in the first place :) no problem at all. Tha

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had started with a long email in the first place :) Simon Laws wrote: And here's the separate thread following on from [1]... I'm looking at what we can do with any endpoint information we have prior to the point at which a composit

Re: Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > > > It wo

Investigating assignment of endpoint information to the domain model was: Re: Domain/Contribution Repository was: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > > It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could > > be > > > used to check if