ant elder wrote:
I can look at the existing specs and copy what they do for things like the
SOAP intent or the JMS binding use of policy.
I understand it can be useful to apply policy to a composite from out side
but i disagree with you comment that anything else would mess up the
domain and
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4,
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The binding.ws element is also extensible so this axis2
config
could be added as extra attributes or
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The binding.ws element is also extensible so this axis2
config
could be added as extra
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The binding.ws element is also extensible so this axis2
config
could be added as extra attributes or elements there couldn't it, eg
binding.ws timeOut=30 /? Which seems
For a few things i've wondered about using intents to configure the
behaviour of an extension but cant see how to code it without hard coding
values. Using TUSCANY-1997 as an example is there some way of saying
something like binding.ws requires=lotsOfConnections / and have that map
to a user
ant elder wrote:
For a few things i've wondered about using intents to configure the
behaviour of an extension but cant see how to code it without hard coding
values. Using TUSCANY-1997 as an example is there some way of saying
something like binding.ws requires=lotsOfConnections / and have that
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
For a few things i've wondered about using intents to configure the
behaviour of an extension but cant see how to code it without hard
coding
values. Using TUSCANY-1997 as an example is there
Hi,
I am just about going to check in what Sebastien is suggesting here. So you
could define a PolicySet as follows : -
sca:policySet name=tuscany:Axis2ConnectionsConfPolicySet
provides=
appliesTo=sca:binding.ws
tuscany:alwaysAppliesTo=sca:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'SomeName']
Ok thanks. The binding.ws element is also extensible so this axis2 config
could be added as extra attributes or elements there couldn't it, eg
binding.ws timeOut=30 /? Which seems simpler if allowed so why is the
policySet approach better?
...ant
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Venkata
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I am just about going to check in what Sebastien is suggesting here. So you
could define a PolicySet as follows : -
sca:policySet name=tuscany:Axis2ConnectionsConfPolicySet
provides=
appliesTo=sca:binding.ws
tuscany:alwaysAppliesTo=sca:[EMAIL
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The binding.ws element is also extensible so this axis2 config
could be added as extra attributes or elements there couldn't it, eg
binding.ws timeOut=30 /? Which seems simpler if allowed so why is the
policySet approach better?
binding.ws timeout=30
14 matches
Mail list logo
