Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/20/07, Snehit Prabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there an updated version of this document (Extending Tuscany) that
reflects the current state of the trunk? Most of the classes in the
models
shown are nonexistent today. Is the whole programming model depicted
here
On 4/20/07, Snehit Prabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there an updated version of this document (Extending Tuscany) that
reflects the current state of the trunk? Most of the classes in the models
shown are nonexistent today. Is the whole programming model depicted here
irrelevant?
thanks
s
Hi,
Is there an updated version of this document (Extending Tuscany) that
reflects the current state of the trunk? Most of the classes in the models
shown are nonexistent today. Is the whole programming model depicted here
irrelevant?
thanks
snehit
On 4/11/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTE
Pamela Fong wrote:
If I choose to use EMF to generate a model to represent my extended SCDL
schema, I would also need to generate EMF model to represent
sca-core.xsdsince the binding schema extends from the core schema. So
I would end up
packaging two generated packages within one binding extensi
If I choose to use EMF to generate a model to represent my extended SCDL
schema, I would also need to generate EMF model to represent
sca-core.xsdsince the binding schema extends from the core schema. So
I would end up
packaging two generated packages within one binding extension. Someone else
com
Pamela Fong wrote:
Hi,
I read the article "Extending Tuscany by contributing a new
implementation /
binding type" by Raymond and Jeremy. Got a question about the
definition of
ModelObject. The example in the article is a very simple java bean-like
object. This is fine if all we have to deal w
Hi,
I read the article "Extending Tuscany by contributing a new implementation /
binding type" by Raymond and Jeremy. Got a question about the definition of
ModelObject. The example in the article is a very simple java bean-like
object. This is fine if all we have to deal with is some simple attr
