On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug list
> [1] allocating to release 1.1 those bugs that I believed should be fixed.
> I was looking for the sort of thing which showed a failure of some feature
> of
On Jan 2, 2008 2:11 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug
> list
> > [1] allocating to release 1.1 those bugs that I believed should be
> fixed.
> > I wa
Apologies for the long delay in responding to this.
I am concerned about the number of significant JIRAs that are open
against the current trunk code. I have been working on two of these
that I consider to be "must fix" for 1.1. They are TUSCANY-1849 and
TUSCANY-1939. I have a fix for TUSCANY-
On Jan 2, 2008 4:06 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies for the long delay in responding to this.
>
> I am concerned about the number of significant JIRAs that are open
> against the current trunk code. I have been working on two of these
> that I consider to be "must fix" for 1
On Jan 2, 2008 2:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 2:11 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug
> > list
> > > [1] alloc
On Jan 2, 2008 5:04 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 2:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2008 2:11 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > As an experimen
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug list
[1] allocating to release 1.1 those bugs that I believed should be fixed.
I was looking for the sort of thing which showed a failure of som
On Jan 2, 2008 10:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug
> list
> >> [1] allocating to release 1.1 those bugs that
On Jan 3, 2008 2:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> As an experiment I looked down the first page of
On Jan 3, 2008 3:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 6:37 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2008 5:04 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 2, 2008 2:20 PM, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jan 2, 2008
On Jan 2, 2008 6:37 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 5:04 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2008 2:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 2, 2008 2:11 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Dec 20, 2007 10:0
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 10:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 10:07 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As an experiment I looked down the first page of the o
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
(cut)
OK, It seems generally that people want me to cut the branch sooner
rather
than later.
So assuming we get the build funnies that have cropped up today
sorted out
and everyone is happy to duplicate further change from trunk to branch,
can
I suggest that
On Jan 3, 2008 9:22 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> (cut)
>
> OK, It seems generally that people want me to cut the branch sooner
> >>>
> >>> rather
> >>> than later.
> >>>
> >>> So assuming we get the build funnies that have cropped up tod
On Jan 3, 2008 5:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't worry about spending time changing the version numbers in trunk, I
> can do that for you, just tell me when I can do it after you've cut the
> branch.
>
Right, I'm also happy to help and I expect others are as we
On Jan 3, 2008 11:40 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 5:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Don't worry about spending time changing the version numbers in trunk, I
> > can do that for you, just tell me when I can do it after you've cut
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 11:40 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 5:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Don't worry about spending time changing the version numbers in trunk, I
can do that for you, just tell me when I can do it after you
On Jan 4, 2008 3:14 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Jan 3, 2008 11:40 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Jan 3, 2008 5:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Don't worry about spending time
On Jan 4, 2008 3:36 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 3:14 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 3, 2008 11:40 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>On Jan 3, 2008 5:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [
19 matches
Mail list logo
