Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-09 Thread Simon Laws
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late > > resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers. > > > > > In the itest

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-08 Thread ant elder
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late > resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers. > > In the itest BindingScaEndpointResolverImpl it says "I can cheat here because..." could you say a lit

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-07 Thread ant elder
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:48 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I've updated all the code that used EndpointProviders. This includes >> runtime-tomcat but I was unable to get this running following Ant's

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-07 Thread ant elder
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've updated all the code that used EndpointProviders. This includes > runtime-tomcat but I was unable to get this running following Ant's > instruction on this thread. It maybe that I did something wrong so I'll > give > it

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-07 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:56 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > ...snip >> > >> > > >> > > The two sets of SPIs could co-exist fo

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-06-03 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:56 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > ...snip > > > > > > > > The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders > > > working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I j

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-21 Thread ant elder
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...snip > > > > > The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders > > working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I just made up that name) > with > > service endpoints. > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > A

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
More comments in line... Simon > Created a separate factory for it (separate as I though the model may need >> to be pluggable as some point) >> > > Would it be possible to just add the create method the AssemblyFactory? Yep, we could do that. Am going to hold back for a little while on thi

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Raymond Feng
Please see my comments below. Thanks, Raymond -- From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:26 AM To: Subject: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re:

RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Mark Combellack
This problem has now been fixed in SVN revision r657009 Thanks, Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Combellack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 May 2008 11:26 > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distribu

RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Mark Combellack
Hi, I've just tried building the latest trunk of Tuscany and I'm getting a compile failure in the new endpoint module. The error I am getting is: [INFO] [INFO] Error for project: Apache Tuscany SCA Default Endpoint Im