Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-09-04 Thread Simon Laws
t; >>>> > >>>> SCA domain (accross multiple nodes on the network) > >>>> --- SCA node (I assume one node per JVM and one JVM per node) > >>>> --- SCA partition (I assume one partition per address space > in > >>>> t

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-09-04 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
s space in the JVM) Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng < [EMAIL PR

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-09-04 Thread Simon Laws
t; > JVM) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Raymond > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Simon Laws" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> > > > Sent: Friday, August 31, 20

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-09-04 Thread Simon Laws
node) > > --- SCA partition (I assume one partition per address space in > > the > > JVM) > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: < tusca

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-31 Thread Simon Laws
quot;Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:46 AM > Subject: Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations > > > > On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-31 Thread Raymond Feng
) --- SCA partition (I assume one partition per address space in the JVM) Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations On 8/31/

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-31 Thread Simon Laws
On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Comments inline. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > - Original Message - > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "tuscany-dev" > Sent: Thursday, August

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-31 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Comments inline. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "tuscany-dev" Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 9:13 AM Subject: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations We now have a number of domain implement

Re: Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-30 Thread ant elder
On 8/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We now have a number of domain implementations in Tuscany Java SCA > including > > - The SCADomain interface > - DefaultSCADomain > - EmbeddedSCADomain > - HotUpdatableSCADomain > - DistributedDomain/Node > > Covering a number of scenarios > > -

Rationalizing SCA Domain implementations

2007-08-30 Thread Simon Laws
We now have a number of domain implementations in Tuscany Java SCA including - The SCADomain interface - DefaultSCADomain - EmbeddedSCADomain - HotUpdatableSCADomain - DistributedDomain/Node Covering a number of scenarios - running a domain in a single node - running a domain across multiple nod