Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Simon Laws
yep - looks good for me too. Thanks all.

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Sebastien. It was the file I missed in the commit. Thank you for fixing it and I'm sorry for the break. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:28 AM

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Sebastien. It was the file I missed in the commit. Thank you for fixing it and I'm sorry for the break. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:28 AM Subject: Re: Removing

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws wrote: I, ahem, invented the missing org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.ConversationSequence class public class ConversationSequence { public static ConversationSequence CONVERSATION_NONE = null; public static ConversationSequence CONVERSATION_START= new ConversationSeq

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Simon Laws
I, ahem, invented the missing org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.ConversationSequence class public class ConversationSequence { public static ConversationSequence CONVERSATION_NONE = null; public static ConversationSequence CONVERSATION_START= new ConversationSequence(); public

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread ant elder
On 5/13/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm having problems with the latest check in. On a fresh update and mvn from the top level I get --- [INFO] Building Apache Tuscany Interface Model [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO]

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Simon Laws
I'm having problems with the latest check in. On a fresh update and mvn from the top level I get --- [INFO] Building Apache Tuscany Interface Model [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] - --- [INFO] artifact org.apache.mav

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-13 Thread Venkata Krishnan
+1 from me as it seems to be much cleaner to me. Thanks - Venkat On 5/12/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The WorkContext was defined to carry some context such as the conversation id, http session id and callback path over the thread local. And the usages are so messy in the

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, The first cut is now in under r537483. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 12:40 AM Subject: Re: Removing WorkContext Yes +1 from me, that would be really good to get done. ...ant On

Re: Removing WorkContext

2007-05-12 Thread ant elder
Yes +1 from me, that would be really good to get done. ...ant On 5/12/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The WorkContext was defined to carry some context such as the conversation id, http session id and callback path over the thread local. And the usages are so messy in the co

Removing WorkContext

2007-05-11 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, The WorkContext was defined to carry some context such as the conversation id, http session id and callback path over the thread local. And the usages are so messy in the code and nobody can really understand how it should be used. As part of the final push for clean SPIs, I propose that