Frank, any comment on this? Is this something you would be willing to
provide in SDOUtil?
Brent
On 7/20/06, Brent Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Traversing from the Types we have to figure out the Types we don't
have seems a lot harder than having a utility in SDO that tells us all
of the
Brent. It would be trivial to add such a method in SDOUtil, if you really
need it.
Frank.
Brent Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/26/2006 12:20:40 PM:
Frank, any comment on this? Is this something you would be willing to
provide in SDOUtil?
Brent
On 7/20/06, Brent Daniel [EMAIL
Frank,
That would be great. I'll open a low priority JIRA to track it.
Brent
On 7/26/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brent. It would be trivial to add such a method in SDOUtil, if you really
need it.
Frank.
Brent Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/26/2006 12:20:40 PM:
Is there a way that I'm missing to retrieve all of the SDO Types
associated with a certain URI? We're doing this today in the DAS by
diving down to EPackage, but would prefer having some sort of utility
to do this in SDO.
Perhaps this is something that should be considered for TypeHelper in
a
I ran this by Steve Brodsky and he suggested that we might be better off
looking up the needed Types from the TypeHelper by the name as needed
rather than asking for all types associated with the URI. We can use
the names we retrieve from ResultSetMetadata and it seems like this will
simplify
This would disallow the scenario where you have a static model with
customers, address, and orders, read some customers and addresses,
and then want to create a new order and associate it with a customer.
At least, you wouldn't be able to create it off the dynamic root.
Brent
On 7/20/06,
If we have Customer then don't we also have the related Order and
Address Types?
Brent Daniel wrote:
This would disallow the scenario where you have a static model with
customers, address, and orders, read some customers and addresses,
and then want to create a new order and associate it
Traversing from the Types we have to figure out the Types we don't
have seems a lot harder than having a utility in SDO that tells us all
of the Types for a URI. But, yes, that's possible.
Brent
On 7/20/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we have Customer then don't we also have the
