gt; question was already in your post.
>
> +1 for doing that.
>
> It'll be nice to have itests testing round tripping between JaxB or SDO
> or XMLBeans and JSON...
>
> >>
> >> - Original Message - From: "Luciano Resende"
> >> <[EMA
at.
It'll be nice to have itests testing round tripping between JaxB or SDO
or XMLBeans and JSON...
- Original Message - From: "Luciano Resende"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:23 PM
Subject: TUSCANY-1337 and S
be engaged to perform
the json <--> * transformations.
Thanks,
Raymond
This will also help with other types than SDO right?
- Original Message - From: "Luciano Resende"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:23 PM
the
json <--> * transformations.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:23 PM
Subject: TUSCANY-1337 and Support for SDO->JSON Databinding
I have a servi
I have a service that produces SDO and is exposed using the JSONRPC
binding. It looks like I have hit the same issue as the one described
in TUSCANY-1337 [1], and the SDO->JSON transformation is not happening
properly and the client side is receiving the following error :
{"error":{"code":593,"msg
