RE: Update on dependency work

2006-09-24 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2006 18:31 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: RE: Update on dependency work Jeremy, Any progress on the runtime info? Many thanks Meeraj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: 20 September

RE: Update on dependency work

2006-09-21 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Jeremy, Any progress on the runtime info? Many thanks Meeraj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: 20 September 2006 17:43 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work This adds the concept of a

RE: Update on dependency work

2006-09-20 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Ok, that is fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: 20 September 2006 17:43 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work This adds the concept of a repository to the RuntimeInfo - do we want to

Re: Update on dependency work

2006-09-20 Thread Jeremy Boynes
rtifactRepository(@Autowire RuntimeInfo runtimeInfo) { this.runtimeInfo = runtimeInfo} } } Ta Meeraj -Original Message- From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2006 22:13 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work It would set the component up - you

RE: Update on dependency work

2006-09-20 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
runtimeInfo = runtimeInfo} } } Ta Meeraj -Original Message- From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2006 22:13 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work It would set the component up - you would want to define an autowire to it e.g. public

Re: Update on dependency work

2006-09-19 Thread Jeremy Boynes
runtime info instnace into the artifcat repo instance? Thanks for your help Meeraj From: Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:12:30 -0700 On Sep 19, 2006, at

Re: Update on dependency work

2006-09-19 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
he.org Subject: Re: Update on dependency work Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:12:30 -0700 On Sep 19, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: Ok, thinking about this further, I have a couple of ideas ... Have an abstract class AbstractMavenRepository with two specializations, 1. WarMavenReposi

Re: Update on dependency work

2006-09-19 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 19, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: Ok, thinking about this further, I have a couple of ideas ... Have an abstract class AbstractMavenRepository with two specializations, 1. WarMavenRepository 2. StandaloneMavenRepository Both will get injected an instance of RuntimeIn

RE: Update on dependency work

2006-09-19 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
eeraj Kunnumpurath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To: Subject: Update on dependency work Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:53:31 +0100 Jeremy, I have checked in the first cut for the ArtifactRepository implementation. It currently supports transitive dependency resolution from

Update on dependency work

2006-09-19 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Jeremy, I have checked in the first cut for the ArtifactRepository implementation. It currently supports transitive dependency resolution from the local maven repo and a set of configured remote repos. There is a simple test case (which I will extend tonight). Outstanding stuff, 1. Define the ma