Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 & Bouncycastle issues

2007-09-16 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there se

Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 & Bouncycastle issues

2007-09-16 Thread ant elder
On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy > intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though > we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be >

Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 & Bouncycastle issues

2007-09-16 Thread Simon Laws
On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy > intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though > we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be >

WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 & Bouncycastle issues

2007-09-16 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be bouncycastle's classes doing the work. In the past there had been so