Woodstox, was: svn commit: r448078 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml

2006-09-20 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Should we do the same for SDO? I see 2.9.3 in the following modules: ./samples/sca/echo.databinding/pom.xml ./sdo/impl/pom.xml -- Jeremy On Sep 19, 2006, at 10:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rfeng Date: Tue Sep 19 22:44:18 2006 New Revision: 448078 URL:

Re: Woodstox, was: svn commit: r448078 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml

2006-09-20 Thread Raymond Feng
- /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml Should we do the same for SDO? I see 2.9.3 in the following modules: ./samples/sca/echo.databinding/pom.xml ./sdo/impl/pom.xml -- Jeremy On Sep 19, 2006, at 10:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rfeng Date: Tue Sep 19 22:44:18 2006 New Revision: 448078

Re: Woodstox, was: svn commit: r448078 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml

2006-09-20 Thread Jeremy Boynes
, was: svn commit: r448078 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml Should we do the same for SDO? I see 2.9.3 in the following modules: ./samples/sca/echo.databinding/pom.xml ./sdo/impl/pom.xml -- Jeremy On Sep 19, 2006, at 10:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rfeng Date: Tue Sep 19 22:44