Re: handling of callbacks with physical wires

2007-03-13 Thread Jim Marino
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jim Marino wrote: Hi Meeraj, I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTarget

Re: handling of callbacks with physical wires

2007-03-13 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jim Marino wrote: Hi Meeraj, I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for callbacks, as they will be used to atta

Re: handling of callbacks with physical wires

2007-03-13 Thread Jim Marino
On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:58 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: Sure, I will do that. Cuurently attach method is agnostic to whether it is forward or callback. If we have specific ones, would the signature change? No I think the signature would be the same but some of the meta-data passed as Physi

RE: handling of callbacks with physical wires

2007-03-13 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
@ws.apache.org Subject: handling of callbacks with physical wires Hi Meeraj, I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for callbacks, as they will

handling of callbacks with physical wires

2007-03-13 Thread Jim Marino
Hi Meeraj, I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for callbacks, as they will be used to attach the callback side of a wire. Can you have th