On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Hi Meeraj,
I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for
PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've
added PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and
PhysicalWireTarget
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Hi Meeraj,
I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for
PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added
PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for
callbacks, as they will be used to atta
On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:58 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Sure, I will do that. Cuurently attach method is agnostic to
whether it
is forward or callback. If we have specific ones, would the signature
change?
No I think the signature would be the same but some of the meta-data
passed as Physi
@ws.apache.org
Subject: handling of callbacks with physical wires
Hi Meeraj,
I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for
PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added
PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for
callbacks, as they will
Hi Meeraj,
I've been working on getting the WireAttachers going for
PhysicalComponentDefinitions. On PhysicalWireDefinition, I've added
PhysicalWireSourcetDefinition and PhysicalWireTargetDefinition for
callbacks, as they will be used to attach the callback side of a
wire. Can you have th