Re: svn move, was: Databinding itest reorg proposal

2007-03-19 Thread Simon Laws
On 3/16/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, apollogies for that. I have to admit that I'm a cvs person at > heart so > just getting to grips with svn. I ljust ooked up svn move and got > that "why > didn't I look there first" feeling, so I'll remember that for next > time. > Thank

Re: svn move, was: Databinding itest reorg proposal

2007-03-16 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Ah, apollogies for that. I have to admit that I'm a cvs person at heart so just getting to grips with svn. I ljust ooked up svn move and got that "why didn't I look there first" feeling, so I'll remember that for next time. Thanks for taking the time to explain. If you're new to Subversion

Re: svn move, was: Databinding itest reorg proposal

2007-03-16 Thread Simon Laws
On 3/15/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 15, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > I forgot to mention that the reason that so many XML files have > suddenly > appeared is that I've take the files that currently live in / > interop and > renamed and refactored them. Thanks fo

svn move, was: Databinding itest reorg proposal

2007-03-15 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Mar 15, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Simon Laws wrote: I forgot to mention that the reason that so many XML files have suddenly appeared is that I've take the files that currently live in / interop and renamed and refactored them. Thanks for explaining as this did look a bit odd. One way to avoid t