Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote: Shore, I am currently leading a team working for a large Canadian financial services institution to develop what is going to be there standardized SOA platform going forward. Currently we are supporting a number of international banking initiatives, with

RE: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

Shore, I am currently leading a team working for a large Canadian financial services institution to develop what is going to be there standardized SOA platform going forward. Currently we are supporting a number of international banking initiatives, with domestic and other channels coming aboar

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

--->if DAS exposes connection thru getConnection() ONLY when managedtx=false, it need to control cases when managedtx=true. So 2. will be needed. If it exposes getConnection() ALWAYS (ignoring managetx), then managedtx loses its meaning and DAS can not control any transaction as client always h

Re: DataObjectUtil.getProperty

DataObjectUtil.getProperty() has been renamed DataObjectUtil.getInstanceProperty(), but you should never be calling either of these internal implementation methods. The proper SDO API is in commonj.sdo.DataObject: /** * Returns the named Property from the current instance properties, *

DataObjectUtil.getProperty

What would be the equivalent operation(s) to replace the following method which we have been using since the M2 release: public static Property getProperty(DataObject dataObject, String propertyName) Thanks, Murtaza

Re: jax-ws instead of axis2

Hi, We don't have the jax-ws support yet and it will be a big plus to Tuscany. Are you considering to help us here :-)? Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Jean-Marc Taillant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:01 AM Subject: jax-ws instead of axis2

Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

Hi, Would you like to share your experience with us? It will be very helpful. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:47 AM Subject: RE: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again) We are

RE: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

We are using Tuscany integrated with spring to provide aspects for logging and exception management. I agree that AOP is the ideal approach for these kinds of pieces of functionality. IMHO I would rather see Tuscany leverage Spring AOP then start developing its own aspect functionality from scr

Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

Hi, I think we have three categories in this area: 1) Monitoring: Listen on the events generated by Tuscany, for example, a component is started or stopped. (Target for management interfaces) 2) Logging: Produce end-user readable information (info/warning/error) which is subject to I18N/L10N.

RE: XSD2JavaGenerator

This is a good workaround. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Frank Budinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 10:18 AM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: XSD2JavaGenerator Hi Murtaza, This is a known generator bug. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: XSD2JavaGenerator

Hi Murtaza, This is a known generator bug. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1505 The problem only occurs if you have two factories with the same name. The factory name, by default, is created using the last part of the package name, so since in your case both your packages end

RE: XSD2JavaGenerator

Thanks. It is the exact same issue. -Original Message- From: Fuhwei Lwo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:54 AM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: XSD2JavaGenerator Your problem seems like T-1505 at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1505 Le

Re: XSD2JavaGenerator

Your problem seems like T-1505 at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1505 Let me ask David, the JIRA reporter, about the possible solution. Murtaza Goga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are attempting to migrate to the current release (1.0 incubating) and we are running into an issue wi

XSD2JavaGenerator

We are attempting to migrate to the current release (1.0 incubating) and we are running into an issue with the static code generator. The init operation in the factory implementation does not compile, the generated code uses the fully qualified package name as a variable name. The options goin

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

On 8/14/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is my opinion: > > 1- There are 2 ways for user to provide a Connection to DAS, create one > and > pass it to DAS on its creation or on ConnectionInfo. The first case is > already giving the access to the Connection to the user. On th

jax-ws instead of axis2

Hello, Do you know if there is a way to use jax-ws instead of Axis2 for web services. If not is there a plan to integrate jax-ws into Tuscany? Thanks in Advance, Jean-Marc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

Just looked more at the code and found something more interesting - :) When there is no connectionInfo in DAS Config, managedtx defaults to true, so when connection is passed by user (as in TransactionTests), managedtx is true. So, with the current code case 4) can not occur (which is actually us