+1, good for both projects. And to reply to a comment in the original email
- I'm not sure that we really need an explicit vote for this can just assume
from all the positive comments so far and lazy consensus that its fine
unless someone complains (which i'm sure they wont).
...ant
On Tue,
Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
Hi,
I created an entry [0] in the Eclipse bugzilla with the proposal.
Your comments are welcome.
Best regards
Stéphane Drapeau
Obeo
[0]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225956
The proposal looks pretty good to me. I have a few comments/questions:
-
Hi,
I created an entry [0] in the Eclipse bugzilla with the proposal.
Your comments are welcome.
Best regards
Stéphane Drapeau
Obeo
[0]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225956
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Stéphane Drapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Haleh, Raymond,
Thank
Haleh, Raymond,
Thank you for your answers.
Haleh, you're right. I make no distinction between tools for SCA developers
and tools for SCA users. The goal of the project is to develop tools to help
users of the SCA technology. I will modify my sentence.
Stéphane Drapeau
Obeo
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008
Hi Stephane,
Welcome to Tuscany. How will changing the status of STP SCA from a component
to a sub project change its future development and focus?
Tuscany community had asked about tools for SCA and because of that I
recently added a website page [1] to collect more information about
available
--
From: Stéphane Drapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: STP SCA Component - STP SCA Tools sub project
Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all,
The proposal is a 3 pages
Hi Stephan,
This looks good since it looks like tools for SCA will get more focus :)
I have a question.
You mention the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a set of
tools for SCA developers and SCA users.
What is the difference between SCA developer and SCA user in this context?
Haleh
