Amazon have just brought to my attention the following title:
Python Testing: Beginner's Guide
Has anyone seen this? Is it any good?
What test frameworks does it cover?
Amazon are remarkably reticent about the actual contents.
Its very new, only published on 22nd January.
Alan G.
Hi Alan,
On 12/02/10 17:34, Alan Gauld wrote:
Amazon are remarkably reticent about the actual contents.
See here: http://tinyurl.com/y9dy62p
I am, btw, always happy to see 'book announcements' on this list -- keep
them coming!
David
___
Tutor
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:26 AM, David ld...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 12/02/10 17:34, Alan Gauld wrote:
Amazon are remarkably reticent about the actual contents.
See here: http://tinyurl.com/y9dy62p
I am, btw, always happy to see 'book announcements' on this list -- keep
them
Hi,
random.choice offers an intuitive way to write the code:
import random
for i in range(10):
print random.choice([head, tail])
Cheers!!
Albert-Jan
~~
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
Have you ever got that piece of advice about - when you have stuck on a
bug you seem unable to track - getting a plush toy to whom you explain
your code? (This is of course a workaround if you do not have a fellow
developer to help you out).
Well... I found out this advice kind of works for me,
In similar vein, I find that a concept suddenly makes more sense to me when
I try to explain it to someone else (or I realize that I don't fully
understand and need to do some more research).
But with regard to the plush toy you mention, I just ran into that anecdote
in Coders at Work. Can't
-Original Message-
From: tutor-bounces+mike.hansen=atmel@python.org
[mailto:tutor-bounces+mike.hansen=atmel@python.org] On
Behalf Of Mac Ryan
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:33 AM
To: tutor@python.org
Subject: [Tutor] Tutor list as pair progamming plush toy
Have
I've discovered that same thing. Usually I end out not sending my message
because in the process of composing my email I end out I, too, find the
errors.
-Wayne
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
hi
I am new territory here and not even sure where to start poking around
other than the os module some.
Essentially i need to do something like a shell script for batch
processing gobs of files. I am trying to use a command line tool (sox,
an open source sound file converter that runs
Matthew Matson wrote:
Hi Tutors,
I am looking for the proper approach regarding the analysis of a
dictionary of combinations I have.
What I need to do is read from a supplied text file that has a unique ID
and that unique ID's associated combination of elements. So let's say I
have the
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Hansen, Mike mike.han...@atmel.com wrote:
From: Hansen, Mike mike.han...@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Tutor list as pair progamming plush toy
To: tutor@python.org
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 11:55 AM
-Original Message-
From:
Mac Ryan quasipe...@gmail.com wrote
I know - this is slightly OT for the list - but I thought to share as
maybe this is a hidden benefit the list is bringing to a few people
without the tutors even knowing it.
Actually I think it is bang on topic.
One of the most common benefits of any
kevin parks k...@mac.com wrote
I wonder if it is possible to use python to call sox and have it do
os.mkdir, process all the input files in a particular directory and
put the converted files into the directory it made with mkdir...
Of course. What do you perceive to be the problem?
This
I created a custom vector type, inheriting from object, and defined __mul__,
__add__, etc. Unfortunately, the operators only work if I type vector *
(int/float/number), in that exact order. My program produces an error if I
instead type number * vector. This makes sense to me, because I haven't
Mark Young wrote:
I created a custom vector type, inheriting from object, and defined
__mul__, __add__, etc. Unfortunately, the operators only work if I
type vector * (int/float/number), in that exact order. My program
produces an error if I instead type number * vector.
Use __rmul__,
Thanks for the help. That's exactly the kind of solution I wanted. I've been
to that page several times already, but just ignored that section
apparently. Thanks alot.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
I want to be able to import multiple instances of a module and call
each by a unique name and it doesn't appear at first glance that
either import or __import__ have what I need. I need this because of
computing platform I have developed where users write python scripts
to do some analysis
Garry Willgoose garry.willgo...@newcastle.edu.au wrote
I want to be able to import multiple instances of a module and call each
by a unique name and it doesn't appear at first glance that either import
or __import__ have what I need.
No because it would be bad practice.
Stateful modules
By the way, Alan Gauld's emails generate an error in my system. His is the
only emails I have a problem with so far. At first it tried to open a News
service.
Randy Raymond
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change
This doesn't make any sense.
What do you mean tries to open up a news service? When you read the
e-mail? What system are you using?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Randy Raymond randyeraym...@mchsi.comwrote:
By the way, Alan Gauld's emails generate an error in my system. His is
the only
There seems to be something of a general consensus in ordering import
statements. Something like standard library imports first. When using
tools like matlablib or tkinter (maybe), must one keep an order among
the relevant imports?
Related to this is the order in which modules are installed.
Hello! I was reading the latest version of Mark Pilgrim's Dive into
Python and am confused with these example about the pluralization
rules. See http://diveintopython3.org/examples/plural3.py and
http://diveintopython3.org/generators.html#a-list-of-patterns
Here is part of the code:
import re
def
22 matches
Mail list logo
