On 05/12/2013 03:40 PM, Alex Norton wrote:
im new to python and im in the middle of making a RPS game for a college
unit.
You sent this message 20 minutes after posting a similar one, with a
DIFFERENT title, on python-list. You really ought to pick a target and
pull the trigger once. Only i
On 12/05/2013 22:44, Matthew Ngaha wrote:
bWater.clicked.connect( water_clicked ) AttributeError: 'int
use a paste site like http://bpaste.net/+python to show us the code.
No, please put the code inline. If the original is too long cut it down
as requested here http://www.sscce.org/
--
I
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 09:58 PM, Daniel Magruder wrote:
>
> Please respond to the list, not the individual. Otherwise you're robbing
> yourself and others of the possibility of learning from and helping multiple
> people. I don't mind if you ALSO reply
>> bWater.clicked.connect( water_clicked ) AttributeError: 'int
use a paste site like http://bpaste.net/+python to show us the code.
i am no expert @ programming myself but that error is telling you you
used an int and tried to access an int method called connect somewhere
in your code. ints do n
im new to python and im in the middle of making a RPS game for a college
unit.
i have used PyQt to create the GUI and i have received help regarding
adding the code to the buttons.
but its missing something as the error
'Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\Me\Desktop\testy.py",
lin
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
[...]
> With no experience in programming other languages, you'd need a different
> kind of tutorial than I sought when I was learning Python. And you
> absolutely need to match your tutorial against the version of Python you're
> running on your
On 12/05/13 12:43, Dave Angel wrote:
Despite going to many sources I can not seem to find a single source
that adequately explains Python 100% without any technical jargon or
assumptions of prior knowledge.
Its impossible to learn to program without learning technical jargon,
but there are tu
On 05/11/2013 09:58 PM, Daniel Magruder wrote:
Please respond to the list, not the individual. Otherwise you're
robbing yourself and others of the possibility of learning from and
helping multiple people. I don't mind if you ALSO reply to me (which is
what reply-all does by default), but man
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jim Mooney wrote:
>> If I'm using a variable-dependent range in a for loop, is Python smart
>> enough to figure the variable once so I don't have to hoist it up?
>
> The gritty details say "yes":
>
> http://
