I find myself in the same mind set as this individual:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/64453/4285911
It is hard to write a proper test with out me initially outlining where
I am going. Perhaps I need to better understand planning and drafting a
programming project before I can hope to emulate TDD.
On 05/05/2015 06:49 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
Not better, just necessary. The two concepts are complementary.
You need both. The developer primarily needs unit testing, the
integrator*(who may of course be the developer in a different
role) needs integration testing and the client/project manager
ne
Update: My previous hack, has been changed. I now put:
import os
import sys
sys.path.append(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..'))
in the __main__.py file located under the tests/ directory and it is
only needed the one time in that one file. Not sure why I was thinking I
would need to
On 05/04/2015 04:49 PM, Martin A. Brown wrote:
Hi there,
Yes, a bit ugly. Have you tried using nose? I have used a similar
project development tree and use nose to run the tests.
I had thought about it, but decided not too, since it was not part of
the standard library. But then again, it is
Project/develop/Project/Project/
There is only __main__.py and Project.py files. The __main__.py file
imports Project.py.
$ python3 Project/develop/Project/Project
$ python3 Project # Assuming cwd is Project/develop/Project
I tested the above on the terminal and it does not work. I get:
wolfrage
I would like some help integrating TDD into my current projects.
My chosen TDD framework is unittest from the standard library.
My system details are: Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit, Python 3.4, bzr(for
version control).
My projects are structured like:
Project > develop > Project > Project > __main__.
On 04/27/2015 01:13 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
On 27/04/15 02:18, alex gonsalez wrote:
Need help trying to implement a CPU scheduling algorithm.
Can I recommend that you read this:
http://www.dabeaz.com/coroutines/Coroutines.pdf
About half way through it has a Excellent example of how an OS schedule
So I was surprised I did not get more feedback on my abused coroutine,
maybe that is good or bad, not sure.
Any ways I am on to trying to make that coroutine act more like the
State Pattern from Gang of Four. And well reading this:
http://gameprogrammingpatterns.com/state.html
I am not sure ho
On 04/02/2015 03:08 PM, Tim Johnson wrote:
You have already received valuable replies from two advanced
python experts.
If you are looking for a book (available digitally for kindle)
I would recommend
Guide To: Functional Python & Comprehension Constructs
by Matt Harrison
Tha
On 04/02/2015 02:52 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
This is not to say that closures are bad. It's just to point out that
just because functional programs use closures quite a lot, doesn't
automatically mean closures are the most appropriate tool for
everything. If there are parts of the language that al
On 04/02/2015 02:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
What are the best practices to create more Functional Python?
Best practices:
* Don't force your code to use one style exclusively. Use the most
natural style for the task. Python makes it easy to mix functional,
procedural, imperative and
On 04/02/2015 01:07 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean is impossible? The specific issues
you are having or the general FP paradigm?
I mean achieving truely functional code, atleast to the extent of some
of the things that I have read. But in general I do not need nor want
any of
These are just some questions that I have regarding the topic of
Functional Programming. I am working towards a more functional approach
to programming but acknowledge that it is far from Functional,
especially since this is mostly impossible in Python.
Questions:
What are the best practices to
Well on the python interpretor did you use python3 or just python?
On 03/06/2015 01:27 PM, Markos wrote:
Hi,
I'm beginning to study the numpy.
When I open a terminal (Debian Squeeze) and run the python interpreter
the command "import numpy as np" run without errors.
But when I run the same co
On 01/12/2015 04:47 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I haven't looked carefully at your code but there's always a smell in
Python when you see structure[x][y]. Can you change the grid so you
always write something like:-
for row in grid:
for cell in row:
process(cell)
I say this as I'm
Updated the code to now allow for a fill_rows optional argument for
Grid, that determines how many rows are filled with values.
I have also added some experimental code to invert the dropping, as in
all of the values can float to the top. Other code is even more
experimental and not yet working
On 01/12/2015 05:00 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
__str__methodf of the grid.
Then the draw method becomes print(self)
And you can also just use print(aGrid) etc.
Implemented with some other improvements using the same idea but applied
to several of the other functions, that provide output.
Now I
On 01/12/2015 05:00 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
Sorry, no time to read the detail, but one thing I thought might be
handy is to convert the draw method to return a string and make it the
__str__methodf of the grid.
Then the draw method becomes print(self)
And you can also just use print(aGrid) etc.
I haven't looked carefully at your code but there's always a smell in
Python when you see structure[x][y]. Can you change the grid so you
always write something like:-
for row in grid:
for cell in row:
process(cell)
I say this as I'm all for short term pain, long term gain, esp
I fixed the other functions to again work as expected. But the
procedural access of the self.grid and self.transposed_grid also
function correctly. That is good because now I can again do lookups if I
need to. Although I do not have a need to at this time.
Can anyone see anything wrong with th
Now I have the output that I expect and procedurally they output matches
the id of the Node/Tile. But I am thoroughly confused as to why my by_id
functions use the opposite grid to get the correct output?
# Output
python3 test1.py
| 6 | 20 | 19 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 11 |
| 20 | 19 | 20 | 11 |
So I was write as I suspected; the grid is not actually being built like
I thought it was. Sure the ID's print fine but when the grid positions
are procedurally accessed the program fails with IndexError.
python3 test1.py
| 19 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 11 | 6 | 19 | 11 |
| 6 | 6 | 11 | 19 |
| 11 |
Ok, now the code works as expected to drop the non zero values. But I
think there exist an error in the naming and display of the col and row
variables at least from with in the GameTile() class, looking into that
now. All Suggestions Welcome! Thank You All.
import random
class GameTile():
I had an issue in my logic and again my named variables provided for
confusion, so I had to add some comments to clarify.
I got much closer by editing my code like this:
def drop_floating_nodes0(self):
i = self.rows
# first_zero_row serves as memory for how far to drop non-zero
On 01/05/2015 06:21 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
SNIP
if total in (17, 21, 28, ...):
Implemented, thanks.
SNIP
The other comment I'd make is to start thinking about how you'd _test_
your program automatically.
SNIP
You are right, I should. But I am fighting with myself on this topic. I
have been
On 01/03/2015 06:46 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 06:10:31PM -0500, WolfRage wrote:
On 01/03/2015 04:42 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
self.transposed_grid = list( zip(*self.grid) )
This results in the same thing with or with out the list() wrapper. Using
Python 3.4.0 (de
On 01/03/2015 04:42 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
self.transposed_grid = list( zip(*self.grid) )
This results in the same thing with or with out the list() wrapper. Using
Python 3.4.0 (default, Apr 11 2014, 13:05:11)
[GCC 4.8.2] on linux
___
Tutor maillist -
On 01/03/2015 04:42 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 01/03/2015 04:22 PM, WolfRage wrote:
On 01/03/2015 06:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
To transpose a grid, you want to use the zip() function.
self.transposed_grid = zip(*self.grid)
I see this gives me a list that is the column. Thus it solves the
On 01/03/2015 06:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
To transpose a grid, you want to use the zip() function.
self.transposed_grid = zip(*self.grid)
I see this gives me a list that is the column. Thus it solves the column
iteration problem, because now I can feed it to my checking and
elimination fun
On 01/03/2015 06:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
self.transposed_grid = zip(*self.grid)
zip() sounds confusing. But I am going to try this and see what it gives
me. But Somehow I think it will require me to understand yield, which I
still do not totally get how to use.
Also from the documentation, wil
On 01/03/2015 10:09 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM -0500, WolfRage wrote:
Python3.4+ Linux Mint 17.1 but the code will be cross platform (Mobile,
Windows, Linux, OSX).
First an explanation of how the game works: The game is a simple
matching game but with a
On 01/03/2015 06:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
My error. Since nodes are GameTile objects, not values, converting to a
tuple is a little trickier:
values = tuple( [node.value for node in nodes] )
if values in table:
do-something
I will try an implement this after I s
On 01/02/2015 10:21 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
This code is way too complex for what it accomplishes. See below.
Yes, that it why it needs to be optimized. It is unfortunate that my
first goes at many tasks are not the most efficient. But hopefully that
will get better as I learn from all of you.
Python3.4+ Linux Mint 17.1 but the code will be cross platform (Mobile,
Windows, Linux, OSX).
First an explanation of how the game works: The game is a simple
matching game but with a twist. Instead of matching a straight 3 in a
row, we have some rules that only certain combinations will resul
First an explanation of how the game works: The game is a simple
matching game but with a twist. Instead of matching a straight 3 in a
row, we have some rules that only certain combinations will result in an
elimination. In general 2 of the same value in a row with with 1 of 2
other possible va
Tutors, on my next iteration I am going to add more of the game code.
Since I am no longer using Doubly Linked Lists, should I create a new
thread? Or should I continue with this thread to continue with the
established context?
___
Tutor maillist -
On 01/02/2015 12:08 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
class GameGrid():
def __init__(self, cols=8, rows=7, **kwargs):
You probably want to reverse the order of the parameters; you've got
almost everything else row-major
You are right, a lot of inconsistency that will lead to errors latter
on. I nee
On 01/02/2015 02:21 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
What is the purpose of the **kwargs? It doesn't get used, it just
silently ignores them.
Hopefully you got the answer for this from the previous message.
Why does the GameTile record the coordinates as strings?
Hopefully you got the answer for
On 01/02/2015 10:37 AM, Alan Gauld wrote:
I use Thunderbird for posting too, and nobody has complained yet about
my code layout.
My account settings are:
Composition&Addressing
Compose in HTML - OFF
Auto quote original then "START REPLY BELOW QUOTE"
My Tbird prefs are:
Composition->General ta
Dave or Steve, what mail program do you use? It appears Thunderbird is
still posting the code all messed up. Which makes it impossible to
communicate effectively with the list.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On 01/02/2015 02:21 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Fixing the mangled formatting, as best as I am able (and can be
bothered).
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 11:48:18PM -0500, WolfRage wrote:
class GameTile():
def __init__(self, id, **kwargs):
# id is (X,Y)
self.id = id
Wh
import sys
class GameTile():
def __init__(self, id, **kwargs):
# id is (X,Y)
self.id = id
class GameGrid():
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self.cols = 8
self.rows = 8
# grid is 2d array as y, x ie [y][x].
self.grid = [[None] * self.rows for i in range(self.cols)]
def make_grid(self)
On 01/02/2015 12:28 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 01/01/2015 11:48 PM, WolfRage wrote:
Final Code Using 2d List instead of Doubly Linked List.
Please don't top-post. Instead, post your comments inline with the
parts of the previous message to which you're responding.
I did reply in
Final Code Using 2d List instead of Doubly Linked List.
class GameTile():
def __init__(self, id, **kwargs):
# id is (X,Y)
self.id = id
class GameGrid():
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self.cols = 7
self.rows = 8
# grid is 2d array as y, x ie [y][x].
self.grid = [[None] * self.rows for i
I wrote a program to help me break out hex strings awhile ago. It was
written to communicate with a Atmega 168. This is written for Python 3.
Here is a snippet, see if this helps you.
s4 = "28 40 7A 7C 05 00 00 34"
hex_array = bytearray.fromhex(s4)
print(s4)
print(list(hex_array))
print(hex_arr
What is the user interface that your program is using, currently? IE:
QT, GTK, Tkinter, Curses, Kivy, Pygame, Or None?
What is the target system on which your program runs?
How are you currently viewing the mean and standard deviation results?
What version of Python are you using and what is your
This is my most recent rendition of the code. It still needs to be
improved. Below I am answering some questions that were posed. Also I
think my code is currently wrong because I think the print_by functions
are both printing the list the same way. Tomorrow I will fix this and
improve the code
Thanks, definitely adding this concept into my code. And re-writing. I
originally hard coded everything just to get it working... but
obviously, it would have been more time efficient to have thought in
these terms from the beginning. Hopefully I can learn to write code more
like this to begin
Here is a condensed version of all of the applicable code but with out
Linked List filled in, as I am preparing to re-write it.
class GameTile():
def __init__(self, id, **kwargs):
self.id = id
class GameGrid():
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self.cols = 8
self.row
OK thanks for the rapid response, I will start rewriting the functions
in this way now, and will come back with what I wind up with.
Also Merry Christmas!
On 12/24/2014 04:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 04:35:06PM -0500, WolfRage wrote:
I wrote some code recent
I wrote some code recently to make a linked list of Nodes for a 2d
graph, so it consists of rows and columns. Now I wanted to make the code
support being doubly linked, forwards and backwards. The difficult part
of this is that the links are per row and per column. But the code I
think is over
All,
I have found a way to use __getattr__() to redirect failed calls to the
variable that holds 'stdscr'. I will draw up some better potential code
tomorrow, and then you can provide me feedback, for a potentially better
method. Or perhaps optimized code. I think I also understand OOP a
little be
> From: Steven D'Aprano
> To: Python Tutor
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Already Initialized Object Inheritance?
> Message-ID: <4df898e9.5050...@pearwood.info>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> WolfRage wrote:
> > Unfortunately I
gt; into stdscr
> Or maybe you meant do that, because I don't know what stdscr or
> the curses module is
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:47 AM, WolfRage
> wrote:
> I can not get this to behave in the manor that I would like. I
> am trying
>
l
generate the error message for that method.
--
Jordan
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 02:04 -0400, Japhy Bartlett wrote:
> When you're subclassing something, you use the syntax:
>
> class Foo(Bar):
>
> It seems like you're trying to do:
>
> class Bar:
> class Foo:
>
I can not get this to behave in the manor that I would like. I am trying
to have an object refereed to as CursesApp.Screen become the already
initialized object "stdscr". To elaborate I would like it to become that
object but to also be able to define additional methods and properties,
so more alon
56 matches
Mail list logo
