On 04/02/2008, Andre Roberge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have complete unit tests for about 20 of the modules I wrote and it
> was very easy to make them work (with no errors) under all 4 Python
> versions. There are only a small number of places where the
> transition from 2.x to 3.0 is g
On Feb 4, 2008 1:26 PM, Eric Brunson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> Like I mentioned earlier, I'm more interested in my learning being 3.x
> compatible, not my scripts. If all I need to do is learn to print("")
> instead of print"" then that's fine.
>
>
> Basically, if you
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 03/02/2008, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did a little research on the question of running the same script
unmodified in Python 2.6 and 3.0. It seems that there is no consensus
opinion and it may depend on your personal tolerance for compatibility
cruft. H
On 03/02/2008, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a little research on the question of running the same script
> unmodified in Python 2.6 and 3.0. It seems that there is no consensus
> opinion and it may depend on your personal tolerance for compatibility
> cruft. Here is a c.l.py t
I did a little research on the question of running the same script
unmodified in Python 2.6 and 3.0. It seems that there is no consensus
opinion and it may depend on your personal tolerance for compatibility
cruft. Here is a c.l.py thread of interest:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.pyt
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Thanks. My concern is not that the code won't run on Python3, rather,
> that the effort that I put into learning 2.x will be wasted when 3.x
> will be current.
No, it will not be wasted. 3.0 is not a new language, it is a major
tuneup of the existing language.
> Now I'm a b
On 03/02/2008, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > The little programming that I need I have been able to get away with
> > silly php and bash scripts. However, my needs are getting bigger and I
> > see Python as an ideal language for my console apps, and the
> > oc
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> The little programming that I need I have been able to get away with
> silly php and bash scripts. However, my needs are getting bigger and I
> see Python as an ideal language for my console apps, and the
> occasional GUI that I might write for the wife. However, with the
> com
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> However, with the coming of Python3 and the new syntax, is this a bad time to
> start learning Python?
Not at all, I'd say. Changes will be fairly small, with the main changes
being:
- print is replaced by a print() function
- / will become the float division operator
- cha
On 03/02/2008, Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > coming of Python3 and the new syntax, is this a bad time to start
> > learning Python? I don't want to learn 2.x if 3.x will replace it,
>
> 3.x won't be the end of changes in Python, amy more tha
"Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> coming of Python3 and the new syntax, is this a bad time to start
> learning Python? I don't want to learn 2.x if 3.x will replace it,
3.x won't be the end of changes in Python, amy more than
other languages change. While the changes for 3.x will be
bigg
The little programming that I need I have been able to get away with
silly php and bash scripts. However, my needs are getting bigger and I
see Python as an ideal language for my console apps, and the
occasional GUI that I might write for the wife. However, with the
coming of Python3 and the new sy
12 matches
Mail list logo
