On 6/9/06, Bernard Lebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey, thanks for the nice explanation Michael!BernardWhoops.. Hit "reply" instead of "reply to all". My apologies to the group. Dang gmail. -Michael
-- There's so many different worlds,So many different suns.And we have just one world,But we liv
> I'd like to know what are the differences at the various os.popenX
> flavors. I read the documentation and I can see they return file
> objects. so what can you do with these file objects? I mean, why
> would you need a set of file objects rather than another?
My OS topic covers some of the
Hey, thanks for the nice explanation Michael!
Bernard
On 6/9/06, Michael P. Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse the slightly pedantic discussion before I get to a real-world
> example, but the differences get into something a bit deeper than Python and
> into what is called "interproces
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:38:58PM -0400, Bernard Lebel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know what are the differences at the various os.popenX
> flavors. I read the documentation and I can see they return file
> objects. so what can you do with these file objects? I mean, why
> would you need a s
Hi,
I'd like to know what are the differences at the various os.popenX
flavors. I read the documentation and I can see they return file
objects. so what can you do with these file objects? I mean, why
would you need a set of file objects rather than another?
Sorry the difference is very not c
