On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Satya Luzy wrote:
> Is there a way to extend the numbers so that there is no more L?
Data can be presented in many different ways. That's something that
you should have control over. Rather than change the definition of
how numbers are representing in the machi
Is there a way to extend the numbers so that there is no more L?
Thanks :)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Alan Gauld
wrote:
> On 22/12/15 10:05, Satya Luzy wrote:
> > I'm currently making a cryptanalysis program that involves up to 150
> > integer digits.
> > The number will be used for multi
On 22/12/15 14:22, Satya Luzy wrote:
> Is there a way to extend the numbers so that there is no more L?
The L is only part of the representation it is not part of the data.
You use the data just like any other integer.
In Python v3 there is no L since there is no longer any distinction
between lo
On 22/12/15 10:05, Satya Luzy wrote:
> I'm currently making a cryptanalysis program that involves up to 150
> integer digits.
> The number will be used for multiplication and exponentiation purpose.
> So, do I need to use something like a big integer class? or does that even
> exist?
Python intege
I'm currently making a cryptanalysis program that involves up to 150
integer digits.
The number will be used for multiplication and exponentiation purpose.
So, do I need to use something like a big integer class? or does that even
exist?
Thank you,
Python learner
_
