On 05/02/13 22:27, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On 5 February 2013 03:56, eryksun wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
Nope, in both Python 2 and 3 iterating over a dict directly just
provides the key. That's also how "if key in dict" works.
A dict implements __contains__ for a
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> I almost wrote this response but then I realised that Dave probably
> meant that "obj in dict" returns True if the dict has a key equal to
> obj rather than if the dict has a (key, value) pair equal to obj.
Thanks, that's probably what Ste
On 5 February 2013 03:56, eryksun wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
>>> Nope, in both Python 2 and 3 iterating over a dict directly just
>>> provides the key. That's also how "if key in dict" works.
>
> A dict implements __contains__ for an efficient "in" test. In general
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
>> Nope, in both Python 2 and 3 iterating over a dict directly just
>> provides the key. That's also how "if key in dict" works.
A dict implements __contains__ for an efficient "in" test. In general,
the interpreter falls back to using iteration i
On 02/04/2013 06:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 05/02/13 09:26, Dave Angel wrote:
Another point. I don't currently have Python 3.x installed, but I seem to
remember that in Python 3 you can use the dict itself as an iterator
providing both key and value. If I'm right, then it could be simplif
On 05/02/13 09:26, Dave Angel wrote:
Another point. I don't currently have Python 3.x installed, but I seem to
remember that in Python 3 you can use the dict itself as an iterator
providing both key and value. If I'm right, then it could be simplified
further to:
for i, (k, v) in enumerate(dat
On 02/04/2013 12:58 PM, Modulok wrote:
Hmm.. no kidding. Well, at least I knew I was over-complicating it.
Cheers!
-Modulok-
Please don't top-post.
Another point. I don't currently have Python 3.x installed, but I seem
to remember that in Python 3 you can use the dict itself as an iterator
Hmm.. no kidding. Well, at least I knew I was over-complicating it.
Cheers!
-Modulok-
On 2/4/13, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 12:13 PM, Modulok wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> Simple question: Is there a common pattern for iterating a dict, but also
>> providing access to an iteration counter? Here'
On 02/04/2013 12:13 PM, Modulok wrote:
List,
Simple question: Is there a common pattern for iterating a dict, but also
providing access to an iteration counter? Here's what I usually do (below). I'm
just wondering if there are other, more clever ways::
data = {'a': "apple", 'b': "banana",
List,
Simple question: Is there a common pattern for iterating a dict, but also
providing access to an iteration counter? Here's what I usually do (below). I'm
just wondering if there are other, more clever ways::
data = {'a': "apple", 'b': "banana", 'c': "cherry"}
i = 0
for k,v in da
10 matches
Mail list logo