Recently, after having some personal problems, I've returned to looking at
the future of not only prototyping languages like python, but also the more
advanced/older(refinement of your computers resources) languages.
My main question/topic, is what is to become of languages like python with
the e
On 14/12/13 04:36, David Hutto wrote:
My main question/topic, is what is to become of languages like python
with the emergence of quantum computing?
Nothing, I suspect, since by the time quantum computing hits the
mainstream we will all have progressed to other languages anyhow.
These kinds
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:36:37PM -0500, David Hutto wrote:
> My main question/topic, is what is to become of languages like python with
> the emergence of quantum computing?
Almost certainly no change. I expect that quantum computing is still
decades away from becoming common in high-end super
On 14/12/2013 04:36, David Hutto wrote:
Recently, after having some personal problems, I've returned to looking
at the future of not only prototyping languages like python, but also
the more advanced/older(refinement of your computers resources) languages.
My main question/topic, is what is to
On 14/12/13 15:37, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I believe that quantum computing is way OT for the Python tutor mailing
list.
Yeah, you are probably right. Although there are precedents where we
have discussed general topics about the future of computing and
where/whether Python fits in.
But QC is
On 14/12/2013 17:14, Alan Gauld wrote:
On 14/12/13 15:37, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I believe that quantum computing is way OT for the Python tutor mailing
list.
Yeah, you are probably right. Although there are precedents where we
have discussed general topics about the future of computing and
whe
On Dec 14, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 14/12/2013 17:14, Alan Gauld wrote:
>> On 14/12/13 15:37, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe that quantum computing is way OT for the Python tutor mailing
>>> list.
>>
>> Yeah, you are probably right. Although there are precedents where
Well, it would fit the market penetration, of corporate-upper middle
class-middle class- the lower socioeconomic level.
It would also fit the market of individuals that have a population control
that intertwines with the dissemination
--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
*CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevel
On 15/12/13 05:24, David Hutto wrote:
Well, it would fit the market penetration, of corporate-upper middle
class-middle class- the lower socioeconomic level.
It would also fit the market of individuals that have a population
control that intertwines with the dissemination
huh?
I didn't unders
On 15/12/2013 04:55, William Ray Wing wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 14/12/2013 17:14, Alan Gauld wrote:
On 14/12/13 15:37, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I believe that quantum computing is way OT for the Python tutor mailing
list.
Yeah, you are probably right. Althoug
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 03:40:38PM +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 15/12/2013 04:55, William Ray Wing wrote:
> >Well, as it turns out, there actually *IS* a commercially available
> >quantum computer on the market today. It is built by a Canadian company
> >"D-Wave Systems" and early prototype
On 15 December 2013 16:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 03:40:38PM +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 15/12/2013 04:55, William Ray Wing wrote:
>
>> >Well, as it turns out, there actually *IS* a commercially available
>> >quantum computer on the market today.
>>
>> Are you sayin
t; >>> apply(l, (3,))
> > 9
>
> The built-in function apply is deprecated in Python 2 and removed in
> Python 3. Instead apply, you should use argument unpacking:
>
> l(*(3,))
>
> In this case, it's silly to unpack a tuple of a single value, instead
> you sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
