Somebody posted a question about this today and I approved
it but it hasn't shown up. We have had about 6 or 7 such
problems in the last month. Mainly they have been thank-you
messages so I didn't make an issue of it but a couple
have been genuine questions, like this was.
So if you have posted
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:54:30AM +, Alan Gauld wrote:
> This behaviour should never be relied on since the definition
> of a "small int" is potentially implementation dependant and
> could even change with Python version or platform. Always
> use == to test integers.
It isn't just
