On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:03 AM, spir denis.s...@free.fr wrote:
Do you realize the inner func will be redefined before each call? Meaning in
your case n calls x n outer loops x n inner loops.
def f() ...
is actually a kind of masked assignment
f = function()...
That's true, but it is
I'm working on a function that seems to cry out for some of its code
to be put in a function. For convenience sake, I've put this new
function inside the one that calls it.
Question 1: Is this bad practice? It works fine that way, but..
Question 2: If the answer to Q1 is no, is there a standard
Richard D. Moores dixit:
I'm working on a function that seems to cry out for some of its code
to be put in a function. For convenience sake, I've put this new
function inside the one that calls it.
Question 1: Is this bad practice? It works fine that way, but..
Question 2: If the answer
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 05:03, spir denis.s...@free.fr wrote:
Do you realize the inner func will be redefined before each call?
Oh, I forgot about that. Thanks!
Dick
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
Richard D. Moores rdmoo...@gmail.com wrote
to be put in a function. For convenience sake, I've put this new
function inside the one that calls it.
Question 1: Is this bad practice? It works fine that way, but..
No, but there are some issues to consider.
Denis has addressed some but one
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 07:28, Alan Gauld alan.ga...@btinternet.com wrote:
Richard D. Moores rdmoo...@gmail.com wrote
to be put in a function. For convenience sake, I've put this new
function inside the one that calls it.
Question 1: Is this bad practice? It works fine that way, but..
No,
